Author

Nikki Ann A. Dahunan*
Cebu Technological University-Main Campus, Cebu City, Philippines

Abstract

Small Group Discussion (SGD) is a collaborative teaching strategy that encourages students to actively participate in learning through the exchange of ideas, sharing of perspectives, and cooperative problem-solving. This strategy provides opportunities for learners to deepen their understanding of concepts, develop critical thinking skills, and improve their academic performance. In this regard, this study determined the effectiveness of Small Group Discussion (SGD) in teaching Economics, specifically the unit on Sektor ng Agrikultura, among Grade 9 students of Biabas Trade High School during the School Year 2026–2027. The study focused on three competencies: analyzing the role of agriculture, fisheries, and forestry in the economy; analyzing the causes and effects of problems in these sectors; and appreciating economic policies that support agriculture. It also examined the students’ experiences in participating in SGD and served as a basis for the development of an enhanced Strategic Activity Material (SAM). A quantitative approach using a single-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed. Forty (40) Grade 9 students participated in the study. Data were gathered through a validated teacher-made pretest and posttest and a researcher-developed questionnaire on student experiences in SGD. Descriptive statistics such as mean, percentage, standard deviation, and weighted mean were used, while paired-samples t-test was utilized to determine significant differences between pretest and posttest scores. Findings revealed that students demonstrated Satisfactory to Fairly Satisfactory performance before the implementation of SGD. After the intervention, performance improved to Satisfactory and Very Satisfactory levels across the three competencies. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores (p < 0.001), indicating that SGD effectively enhanced students’ learning in Economics. Students also reported positive experiences in terms of engagement and participation, collaborative learning, learning experience, and perceived improvement in performance, with overall ratings interpreted as Often. Based on the findings, an enhanced Strategic Activity Material entitled AGRI-UGNAYAN was proposed to strengthen collaborative learning and address students’ learning experiences in Economics.

Keywords:  Small Group Discussion, Economics education, Araling Panlipunan 9, sektor ng agrikultura, collaborative learning, student performance, strategic activity material.

*Corresponding author / Email: amoranikkiann123@gmail.com
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05041652

Recommended citation:
Dahunan, N. A. A. (2026). Small group discussion on the academic performance in economics of Grade 9 students. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (4), 1160-1175. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05041652

Read the full text

References

Antony, J. P., & Arya, R. (2025). Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of school students in social sciences: A meta-analysis. BSSS Journal of Education, 14(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.51767/je1404

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2022). Kurikulum untuk pemulihan pembelajaran [Curriculum for learning recovery]. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., Lubben, F., Campbell, B., & Robinson, A. (2009). Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802713507

Biesel, M., & Brame, C. J. (2015). Group work: Using cooperative learning groups effectively. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.

Brame, C. J., & Biel, R. (2015). Setting up and facilitating small group discussions. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.

Chang, Y., & Brickman, P. (2018). When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), Article ar52.

Department of Education. (2016). Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016).

Department of Education. (2016). The Learning Action Cell (LAC) as a K to 12 school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning (DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016).

Ekahitanond, V. (2014). Promoting university students’ critical thinking skills through peer feedback activity in an online discussion forum. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v59i2.55617

Estrera, R. B. (2020). The K-12 social studies curriculum in the Philippines: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 15–25.

Fran, J. C. (2021). Teaching strategies and academic performance of students in social studies. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(3), 45–60.

Gonzalez, A. M. (2015). Small group discussion as an interactive strategy in the classroom. Educational Press.

González, J. M., & García-Meca, E. (2015). Social constructivism and active learning: The role of peer discussion in higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 110–118.

Gregg, C., & Bowling, A. (2023). Undergraduate student perceptions of cooperative discussion groups as a classroom engagement tool. NACTA Journal, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.92

Joe, N. M. (2021). Method of teaching Araling Panlipunan and its effect on the grade-10 students’ performance in Indanan National High School Timbangan Campus Jolo, Sulu Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(12), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2021.51207

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning in the classroom (Rev. ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2020). Evolutionary and cognitive load perspectives on collaborative learning. Routledge.

Kozanitis, A., & Nenciovici, L. (2022). Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis. Higher Education, 86(6), 1377–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8

Lee, S., Williams, M., Rice, M., & Wijekumar, K. (2026). A meta-analysis of social studies interventions for secondary students’ learning. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543261418046

Mahilum, D. Z. E., & Escarlos, G. S. (2025). Sociocultural theory in the 21st-century Philippine secondary classroom: A systematic review of collaborative. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(26), 8809–8814. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0666

Marcon, J. M. (2022). Effects of team discussion on students’ academic performance in social studies. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2022/v16i12451

Marlina, L. (2018). The implementation of student-centered learning in social science education. Journal of Social Science Education, 7(2), 88–101.

Martínez-Hita, M., Carrasco, C. J. G., & Martínez, P. M. (2021). The effects of a gamified project based on historical thinking on the academic performance of primary school children. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00796-9

Rini, S. (2017). Developing democratic values through collaborative learning in schools. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 12(4), 210–225.

Serohijos, C. J. S., Goc-ong, M. B., & Baluyos, G. R. (2025). Using collaborative judgment session strategy (CJSS) in enhancing student awareness of economic sectors. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000131

Stoel, G., van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2014). Teaching towards historical expertise: Developing a pedagogy for fostering causal reasoning in history. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam), 47(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.968212

Tutal, Ö. (2023). Active learning improves academic achievement and learning retention in K-12 settings: A meta-analysis. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 18(3), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.18.3.19288

Vander Ark, T., & Schneider, C. (2015). The power of networking: Collaborative learning in the 21st century. Getting Smart.

Zhan, Y., Yan, Z., Wan, Z. H., Xiang, W., Zeng, Y., Yang, M., & Yang, L. (2023). Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13310

Zhao, L., Wang, X., Wang, Q., Gao, Y., & Huang, J. (2020). Exploring the impact of student characteristics on collaborative learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 584.