Author

Marylen T. Jacinto
Northeastern College
Santiago City, Isabela, Philippines

Abstract

Educational leadership plays a crucial role in shaping school climate, organizational effectiveness, and interpersonal relationships within basic education institutions. However, limited empirical research has examined the predictive relationship between leadership style and conflict management strategies in rural Philippine school settings. This study investigated whether leadership styles significantly predict the conflict management strategies employed by school heads in the San Mariano II District. Using a descriptive-correlational quantitative design, data were collected from 147 teachers and school heads across 19 public schools through the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) and the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI). Results revealed that transformational and transactional leadership were highly practiced, while compromising and collaborating were the dominant conflict management strategies. Correlation analysis showed that transformational leadership was strongly associated with collaborative and compromise-based approaches, whereas laissez-faire leadership was linked to avoidance behaviors. The findings confirm that leadership style significantly influences conflict resolution practices and underscore the importance of strengthening transformational leadership in rural schools.

Keywords:  Leadership style, conflict management, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, rural schools

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501813

Recommended citation:
Jacinto, M. T. (2026). Leadership style as a predictor of conflict management strategies in schools: Perspectives from the field. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (1), 9078-9084. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501813

Read the full text

References

Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire manual (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680

Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). SAGE Publications.

Mangulabnan, B. T., Dela Rosa, R. I., & Vargas, D. S. (2022). Effects of leadership styles and conflict management strategies on school performance in the Philippines. Journal of Positive School Psychology. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com

Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rahim, M. A. (2011). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Transaction Publishers.

Rahim, M. A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3), 1323–1344. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.44.3c.1323

Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80

Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. CPP, Inc.