Authors
Jun M. Suico*
San Remigio National High School
Poblacion, San Remigio, Cebu, Philippines
Email: jun.suico001@gmail.com
Nolasco K. Malabago
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus
M.J. Cuenco Cebu City, Philippines
Abstract
The rapid growth of digital technologies in the senior high school classroom creates unique development-related challenges, especially digital distractions that can interrupt students’ attention. This study is situated in the concept of Development Education, and it investigates the ways that digital distractions in technology-integrated learning environments predict student attention in Grade 11 students at San Remigio National High School. Using a quantitative descriptive–correlational research design, data were gathered from fifteen purposively selected respondents using a researcher-developed questionnaire that measured digital distractions (social media use, messaging applications, online gaming and entertainment, and non-academic internet browsing) and student attention (sustained attention, selective attention, and attentional control). The descriptive statistics and inferential analysis are used to analyze and interpret the data. Results suggested that students report little time spent on overt non-academic digital activity in class, whereas passive distractors such as notifications and entertainment-related content were believed to negatively affect attention. Results also suggested that sustained attention and attentional control were moderate, but selective attention was low in technology-rich classrooms. Digital distractions were statistically significantly associated with student attention and were found to be significant by use of statistical means, proving that digital distractions can predict attention levels of students. These results reinforce the notion that digital distractions represent not only a behavioral problem of the individual but also a systemic developmental problem for a class, influenced by class settings, school policies, and their self-regulation. This study highlights the development-sensitive interventions, such as developing policies on responsible technology use, optimizing instructional design, and promoting digital self-regulation to enable the integration of technology to positively affect, rather than impede the learning process in a school’s senior high system.
Keywords: Digital distractions, student attention, Technology-Integrated classrooms, development education, Senior High School, digital self-regulation, responsible technology use
*Corresponding author
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501728
Recommended citation:
Suico, J. M., & Malabago, N. K. (2026). Digital distractions as a development issue affecting student attention in Technology Integrated Senior High School Classrooms. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (1), 8037-8047. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501728
Read the full text
References
Al-Abyadh, M. H., Alqahtani, A. S., & Alzahrani, S. S. (2024). Self-regulation strategies and attentional control in technology-integrated learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1897–1916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11942-7
Blumberg, F. C., Deater-Deckard, K., & Hummer, J. F. (2022). Self-regulation, digital media use, and attention in adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 79, 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101381
Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2022). Does multitasking with social media undermine adolescents’ learning? Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107114
Christodoulou, C., Nikolaou, K., & Spanoudis, G. (2025). Passive smartphone presence and attentional control: Automatic attentional shifts in learning contexts. Journal of Experimental Education, 93(1), 67–84.
Deng, L. (2024). Self-regulated learning and attentional stability in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10245-9
Dindar, M., Akbulut, Y., & Ozan, O. (2022). Multitasking, cognitive load, and sustained attention among adolescents: The role of messaging applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107049
El-Badramany, A. M., Hassan, R. A., & Abdelrahman, H. M. (2023). Effects of cognitive self-regulation training on attentional control and impulsivity among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(6), 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000812
Eldarov, M. (2025). Digital technology use, self-regulation, and attention in secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 90, 101865.
Gallen, C. L., Smith, J. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2023). Sustained attention as a predictor of academic skill acquisition in adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(4), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000754
Gheller, F., McCarthy, M., & Dockrell, J. E. (2023). The impact of classroom noise on children’s cognitive performance and selective attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 86, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101963
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2021). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow, and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
Hasan, M. R. (2024). Perceived versus actual attentional control in mobile-device-rich classrooms. Computers & Education, 198, 104749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104749
Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., Cardella, G. M., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2022). Technology use and academic engagement: A study of internet-enabled learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7923–7941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10963-5
Kushlev, K., Proulx, J., & Dunn, E. W. (2021). Silence your phones: Smartphone notifications increase inattention and task interruptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(11), 2306–2320. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000972
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2022). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 24(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820975487
Martin, F. (2025). Digital distractions and selective attention in secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 44–60.
Martin, F., Sun, J. C. Y., & Westine, C. D. (2025). Digital distractions, cognitive overload, and attention in technology-intensive learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(3), 415–432.
May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2021). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2021.4461
OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., & von Gontard, A. (2021). Gaming-related cognitive load and its effects on academic task performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106835
Ravizza, S. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.007
Roque, L. S. (2025). Purposeful technology integration and student engagement: Rethinking digital distraction in classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 89–108.
Rosen, L. D., & Lim, A. F. (2020). The distracted student: Effects of multitasking, notifications, and task switching on learning. Educational Psychology, 40(6), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1679143
Saleem, M., Alrasheedi, M., & Khan, S. A. (2024). Multitasking, digital device use, and attentional control among secondary school students. Computers & Education, 197, 104742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104742
Seemiller, C. (2025). Generation Z learner engagement: Strategies for managing digital distraction. Routledge.
Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & De Freitas, S. (2025). Attention, cognitive load, and prolonged instruction in secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 241–257.
Stavropoulos, V., Beard, C., Griffiths, M. D., Buleigh, T., Gomez, R., & Pontes, H. M. (2020). Measurement invariance of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short Form between Australian and U.S. adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.60
Sun, J. C. Y. (2024). Designing learning environments to support sustained attention: The role of cognitive engagement patterns. Computers & Education, 196, 104711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104711
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34387-2
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2022). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1086/713834
Wang, Y., Chen, N. S., & Anderson, T. (2023). Aligning smartphone and social media use with instructional goals: Effects on attention and engagement. Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880
Yulianti, K., Fitriani, R., & Suryadi, A. (2023). Self-regulated learning as a moderator of non-academic internet use in digital classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221116784
Ziegler, S., Lohmann, S., & Reinders, H. (2023). Regulating smartphone use in classrooms: Effects on attention and learning behavior. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101711
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.