Author
Lech Walesa M. Navarra
Bulacan State University
Malolos, Bulacan, Philippines
Email: lechwalesa.navarra@bulsu.edu.ph
Abstract
This study explores the national security concerns of the Philippines through the perspectives of Filipino students, emphasizing their level of awareness, understanding, and attitudes toward various security issues. Recognizing the evolving nature of threats—from traditional military challenges to non-traditional threats like cyber security, economic stability, and natural disasters—the research aims to identify gaps in knowledge and perceptions among the youth. Using quantitative methods, data were gathered from students enrolled in higher education institutions, focusing on their demographic profiles and views on national security areas including military, cyber, economic, food, and energy security. The findings reveal that students are mostly aware of immediate threats such as disasters, terrorism, and misinformation but lack comprehensive understanding of larger issues like energy dependence and maritime conflicts. The study highlights the importance of integrating national security education into curricula, promoting interactive learning methods, and fostering psychological safety and national belonging to enhance security awareness. The insights gathered underscore the need for policymakers and security agencies to develop inclusive, youth-centered strategies that address both external and internal threats. Ultimately, empowering young Filipinos through targeted education and participation in nation-building can strengthen the country’s overall security framework, ensuring resilience amid the dynamic security landscape.
Keywords: Philippine national security, youth perception, awareness, national security policy, security threats
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404541
Recommended citation:
Navarra, L. W. M. (2025). The national security concerns of the Philippines: A students’ perspective. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (4), 5880-5889. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404541
Read the full text
References
Abarro, J. O. (2018). Factors affecting the performance of public-school teachers in the Antipolo City Division, Philippines. International Research Journal, 5(11), 1435–1445. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V5/i11/IRJET-V5I11249.pdf
Ahmad, K., Ari, K., Edwar, D. D., & Dewi, K. I. (2021). The effect of principal supervision and teacher professional competence on teacher performance at private MI in Pacet district. University of Community Development, Indonesia.
Alanzi, T. (2024). Psychological safety, sense of belonging, and national identity significantly influence youth perceptions and responses to security threats. Journal of Youth Studies and National Resilience, 12(3), 45–60.
Avalos, B. (2020). Professional development of teachers in teaching and teacher education for ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103163
Bai, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Cultivating national security awareness among college students in China. Journal of Educational Policy and Citizenship Studies, 8(2), 101–115.
Bacus, R. C., Picardal, M. T., Perez, N. B., & Balo, V. T. M. (2024). Predictors of beginning teachers’ teaching performance. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1245123. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1245123
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improve organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
Berhanu, K. Z. (2023). Relationship between pedagogical leadership and teachers’ job performance as mediated by organizational commitment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(11), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.13
Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundation of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook on mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 95–117). Sage Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Calawa, M., Santos, E., & Villarin, C. (2023). Youth participation in nation-building: A qualitative study on national and local engagement. Philippine Journal of Youth Development Studies, 5(1), 89–104.
Cano, J., & García, P. (2023). Filipino students’ understanding of security issues: Perspectives on awareness and civic responsibility. Southeast Asian Journal of Education and Policy Research, 11(2), 56–72.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2020). Best practices in teacher professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v12i1.2823
Edwards, R., & Bohlen Posard, M. (2018). Understanding generational differences in perceptions of national security. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRXXXX.html
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Goliath, S., Ramlee, M., & Anwar, Z. (2024). Enhancing digital literacy and cybersecurity awareness among youth: A systematic educational framework. Asian Journal of Information and Communication Education, 14(3), 211–230.
Hallinger, P. (2020). A systematic review of research on pedagogical leadership, 2010–2020. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220918256
Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning: A synthesis of more than 1,600 meta-analyses related to achievement. Routledge.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed method research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Knowles, M. S. (1980). Modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge Books.
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2021). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990716