*Dimaylee A. Davidson and Fernando T. Herrera, PhD (Authors)
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a Structural Equation Model (SEM) that captures the influence of learning style, personality traits, and emotional intelligence on the academic performance of Grade 4 learners in the Division of Butuan City. Employing a descriptive-predictive quantitative research design, data were collected from 341 learners using standardized survey instruments. The study found that most learners exhibited a kinesthetic learning style and displayed high levels of openness and agreeableness, alongside average levels of neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness. Emotional intelligence dimensions such as self-awareness, motivation, and social skills were strongly manifested, while empathy and emotion regulation appeared moderately. In terms of academic outcomes, most learners achieved “outstanding” or “very satisfactory” general weighted averages (GWA), with none performing below satisfactory levels. Statistical analyses revealed significant positive correlations between academic performance and each of the independent variables. A multiple linear regression model showed that 75.9% of the variance in GWA could be explained by the combined effects of learning style, personality traits, and emotional intelligence. To address potential multicollinearity, a Partial Least Squares (PLS)-based SEM was developed, demonstrating strong reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The model accounted for 66% of the variance in academic performance and confirmed that these psychosocial and cognitive variables are significant predictors of student success. The study concludes that the interplay among learning preferences, personality, and emotional intelligence offers valuable insights into learner achievement and provides a robust framework for future educational planning and intervention.
Keywords: Structural Equation Model, academic performance, learning style, personality traits, emotional intelligence, Grade 4 learners, PLS-SEM
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403276
Recommended citation
Davidson, D.A., Herrera, F.T. (2025). The influence of learning style, personality traits, and emotional intelligence to the academic performance of 4th Grade pupils: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. Pantao: International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 4 (3), 3119 – 3128. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403276
Read full text
Reference
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2021). Emotional intelligence: Implications for personal, social, academic, and workplace success. In R. J. Sternberg, S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 578–610). Cambridge University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
DepEd Order No. 014, s. 2023. (2023). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the National Learning Camp. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph
Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of self-regulated learning in primary education: Meta-analysis and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09506-6
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (2021). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
Marquez, L. R., Dela Cruz, J. A., & Santos, M. E. (2023). Classroom participation and academic performance: A correlation study among intermediate learners. Philippine Journal of Education Research and Studies, 5(2), 44–56.
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2020). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 12(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919896251
O’Brien, L. (1985). Learning Style Inventory. Learning Style Assessment Tools for Educators. [Original instrument]
Purwanto, A., & Sudargini, Y. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for business research: A tutorial and application. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(3), 114–123.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2018). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2024). Big Five Inventory – Short Form (BFI-10): Manual and validation studies. Psychological Test Publishing.
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2022). Emotional intelligence and academic performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 187, 111413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111413
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2021). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.
Yusoff, M., Haji-Othman, Y., & Hassan, R. (2020). Assessing discriminant validity of measurement model using HTMT criterion. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(2), 263–270.