ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043


> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

> Licensing Terms and Conditions
>
Copyright Policy


Latest Articles

Author

Myra Lita E. Lariza*
Filamer Christian University, Inc., Roxas City, Capiz, Philippines

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the levels of learning mindset, technology utilization practices, and self-efficacy among high school learners in the Province of Capiz during the School Year 2025–2026 as a basis for developing a Learning Empowerment Program. A mixed-methods research design was employed, integrating a quantitative survey-correlational approach with qualitative focus group discussions for data triangulation. The study involved 390 high school learners selected from a population of 74,591 students in the Capiz and Roxas City Divisions through stratified proportional random sampling. Data were gathered using researcher-developed Learning Mindset, Technology Utilization Practices, and Self-Efficacy Questionnaires, which underwent expert validation and reliability testing. The instruments obtained Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.960, 0.952, and 0.948, respectively. Descriptive statistics, including frequency count, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, were employed, while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson r) were used for inferential analysis at a 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed very high levels of learning mindset (M = 4.51, SD = 0.21), technology utilization practices (M = 4.39, SD = 0.17), and self-efficacy (M = 4.38, SD = 0.31). No significant differences in self-efficacy were observed across levels of learning mindset (F = 1.012, p = 0.315) and technology utilization practices (F = 3.746, p = 0.054). Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between learning mindset and technology utilization practices (r = 0.040, p = 0.430). However, significant but weak positive relationships were established between learning mindset and self-efficacy (r = 0.163, p = 0.001) and between technology utilization practices and self-efficacy (r = 0.128, p = 0.011). The qualitative findings provided additional perspectives on students’ learning attitudes, digital engagement, and confidence in accomplishing academic tasks. These findings indicate that although high school learners demonstrate strong learning mindsets, extensive technology utilization, and high self-efficacy, the relationships among these variables differ in strength and statistical significance. Consequently, Project LEARN+ (Leveraging Empowerment for Adaptive, Resilient, and Networked Learners) was developed as a proposed Learning Empowerment Program to sustain positive learning mindsets, promote responsible and purposeful technology utilization, and strengthen students’ self-efficacy through structured, collaborative, and technology-integrated learning activities.

Keywords: Learning mindset, technology utilization practices, self-efficacy.

*Corresponding author / Email: myralita.lariza@deped.gov.ph
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05041657

Recommended citation:
Lariza, M. L. E. (2026). Learning mindset, technology utilization practices and self-efficacy of high school learners: Basis for learning empowerment program. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (4), 1268-1288. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05041657

Read the full text

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Burnette, J. L., Knouse, L. E., Vavra, D. T., O’Boyle, E., & Brooks, M. A. (2020). Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 77, Article 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101816

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. Robinson.

Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002

Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Li, C. H., & Xue, J. (2023). Growth mindset and academic achievement among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1189374.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en

Otani, T. (2017). What is qualitative research? Yakugaku Zasshi, 137(6), 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.16-00224-1

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543

Ruel, E., Wagner, W. E., III, & Gillespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. SAGE Publications.

Schleider, J. L., Abel, M. R., & Weisz, J. R. (2015). Implicit theories and youth mental health problems: A random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.11.001

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Trautner, M., & Schwinger, M. (2020). Integrating the concepts self-efficacy and motivation regulation: How do self-efficacy beliefs for motivation regulation influence self-regulatory success? Learning and Individual Differences, 80, Article 101890.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Published in