ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043


> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

> Licensing Terms and Conditions
>
Copyright Policy


Latest Articles

Author

Zaldy H. Bacus*
Cebu Technological University-Main Campus, Cebu City, Philippines

Abstract

Small Group Discussion (SGD) is a learner-centered instructional method where Grade 11 students are organized into groups of two to six members to interactively explore Oral Communication competencies. In this study, it serves as the primary intervention to reduce speech anxiety and enhance verbal proficiency. This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effectiveness of the Small Group Discussion (SGD) instructional method in enhancing the academic performance and communicative proficiency of Grade 11 Senior High School students in Oral Communication in Context during School Year 2025–2026. Employing a one-group pretest–posttest design with 40 purposively sampled learners organized into small collaborative teams (2–6 members), the investigation assessed performance across three core DepEd competencies: explaining communication processes, applying breakdown repair strategies, and identifying speech contexts. Baseline pretest results indicated foundational performance, with competency means ranging from 4.33 to 5.00 (Fairly Satisfactory to Satisfactory). Following the SGD intervention, posttest assessments demonstrated substantial learning gains, with mean scores rising to 7.18–7.95 (Very Satisfactory). Paired-samples t-tests confirmed statistically significant improvements across all targeted competencies (p<0.001), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis (H0). The highest mean gain (+2.95) was recorded in strategic competence (using strategies to avoid communication breakdown). An assessment of implementation concerns yielded an overall weighted mean of 2.88 (Often). The most prominent operational challenges identified were linguistic barriers during transitions from the local dialect to the target language (WM = 3.35), restricted instructional class time (WM = 3.33), social anxiety during peer interactions (WM = 3.28), and a lack of explicit pre-discussion guidance (WM = 3.15). The study concludes that Small Group Discussion is a robust, learner-centered intervention that significantly strengthens students’ communicative competence and conceptual mastery. However, maximizing its pedagogical impact requires proactive teacher mediation, structured participation rubrics, and time-management scaffolding. Based on these findings, a strategic communication simulation matrix and an enhanced learning activity framework were developed for seamless curriculum integration.

Keywords:  Small Group Discussion (SGD), Oral Communication in Context, communicative competence, communication breakdown, speech context, Senior High School, instructional strategy.

*Corresponding author / Email: zaldy.bacus@deped.gov.ph
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05041650

Recommended citation:
Bacus, Z. H. (2026). Small group discussion (SGD): A method of instruction in teaching oral communication in the senior high school. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (4), 1123-1137. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05041650

Read the full text

References

Alda, R. (2023). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in senior high school English classes. World Journal of English Language, 13(6), 211–211. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n6p211

Bohari, L. (2019). Improving speaking skills through small group discussion at eleventh grade students of SMA Plus Munirul Arifin NW Praya. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 7(1), 68–68. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v7i1.1441

Brame, C. J., & Biel, R. (2015). Setting up and facilitating small group work. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.

Buzarna-Tihenea, A., Nădrag, L., Doca, G., Harmer, J., Lunenburg, F., Slama-Cazacu, & Tudor, I. (2017). The role of communication in the student-centered classroom. Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy. https://doi.org/10.21279/1454-864x-17-i1-087

Chang, Y., & Brickman, P. (2018). When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), Article ar52. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199

Crisianita, S., & Mandasari, B. (2022). The use of small-group discussion to improve students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1680

Department of Education. (2016a). Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016).

Department of Education. (2016b). The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 professional development strategy for teachers and school leaders (DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016).

Department of Education. (2020). K to 12 most essential learning competencies (MELCs).

Estrera, R. K. (2020). Social studies education in the Philippines: Curricular overview and challenges. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(2), 253–272.

Fang, W., Cassim, F. A. K., Hsu, C.-N., & Chen, N. (2018). Effects of reciprocal peer feedback on EFL learners’ communication strategy use and oral communication performance. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0061-2

Farianka, A., Nadrun, N., & Hasyim, Z. (2025). Developing speaking skills of the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Sigi thourgh small group discussion. Riwayat Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 8(4), 6736–6745. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.50046

Fran, J. D. (2021). Effectiveness of teaching strategies in improving students’ academic performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(3), 45–56.

Gonzalez, J. (2015). The big list of class discussion strategies. Cult of Pedagogy.

González, J. M., & García-Meca, E. (2015). Social constructivism and active learning in business education. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 227–235.

Hernandez-Cherrez, E., Hidalgo-Camacho, C., & Escobar, P. (2021). Communication games: Their contribution to developing speaking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14437a

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning on student achievement. Routledge.

Kahar, A., Wilian, S., & Lail, H. (2025). Students’ perceptions of the use of group discussions method in teaching basic oral communication at SMAN 1 Gerung. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 5(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v5i1.833

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2020). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

Lemana, H. E. (2022). Communication strategies of English majors in Philippine classroom discourses: Basis for an enhancement module on strategic competence. SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975676

Marlina, R. (2018a). The implementation of small group discussion in teaching speaking to secondary school students. Journal of English and Education, 6(1), 56–63.

Marlina, R. (2018b). The zone of proximal development in the language classroom. Springer.

Nuraini, E., Amrullah, Melani, B. Z., & Amin, M. (2025). Using small group discussion for English speaking at Vocational High School (SMKN) 1 Pujut. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 5(4), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v5i4.952

Pambudi, L. P., & Hariayanti, N. (2023). Analysis of communication strategies used for lengkuas island tourism promotion by the tourism and culture office of Belitung. Symposium of Literature Culture and Communication (SYLECTION) 2022, 3(1), 412–412. https://doi.org/10.12928/sylection.v3i1.13931

Patricia, F. P., Said, M. M., Patmasari, A., & Marhum, M. (2024). Enhancing L2 speaking skills through small group discussion. Pulchra Lingua A Journal of Language Study Literature & Linguistics, 3(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.58989/plj.v3i2.45

Santos, E. (2023). Using mobile-supported self-learning modules in developing oral communication skills of Grade 9 ESL students. American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1632

Valentine, C., Jamiluddin, J., Wahyudin, W., & Marhum, M. (2023). Developing students’ speaking skill through small group discussion (SGD) technique. Jurnal Onoma Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(2), 1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i2.2895

Vander Ark, T., & Schneider, C. (2015). Deep learning: How collaboration and communication prepare students for the future. Getting Smart.

Wiratno, W., & Huda, M. (2024). The effect of spontaneous group discussion in speaking skill to senior high school students. Journal of Development Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v8i2.404

Yustina, L. S., Besral, B., & Sukandi, S. S. (2021). Small group discussion in actual ELT speaking classes. Jurnal Arbitrer, 8(2), 189–189. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.8.2.189-196.2021

Zhao, L., Wang, L., Wang, J., Gao, W., & Huang, J. (2020). Investigating the effects of cognitive load and learning styles on student performance in collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1321–1345.

Published in