Author
Shierra Lee M. Solon*
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City, Philippines
Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of game-based learning in students’ mastery of Cell Division, specifically in competencies related to identifying the phases of mitosis and meiosis and describing their structural changes. Using a pretest–posttest control group design, 30 respondents were divided into two groups: a control group that received traditional instruction and an experimental group that received game-based learning. Results showed that both groups exhibited low initial mastery, with pretest means of 10.13 for the control group and 12.73 for the experimental group. After instruction, both groups improved significantly, as indicated by paired t-tests with substantial effect sizes (d = 3.05 and d = 3.02, respectively). However, the experimental group attained a significantly higher posttest mean (25.67) than the control group (21.20), with a very large between-group effect size (d = 1.38). Although gain scores did not significantly differ, the experimental group’s mastery level was considerably higher. Findings demonstrate that game-based learning enhances students’ conceptual understanding more effectively than traditional teaching. The study recommends integrating game-based tools in biology instruction to support active learning, engagement, and high-level mastery of complex scientific concepts.
Keywords: Game-based learning, cell division mastery, mitosis and meiosis, student performance, experimental research design.
*Corresponding author / Email: shierralee.mulle@deped.gov.ph
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21364497
Recommended citation:
Solon, S. L. (2026). Online game-based learning: A strategy to enhance learning of the cell division among Grade 11 STEM students. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (3), 1175-1190. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21364497
Read the full text
References
Akpan, V. I., Igwe, U. A., Mpamah, I. B. I., & Okoro, C. O. (2020). Social constructivism: Implications for teaching and learning. British Journal of Education, 8(8), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013
Aldahmash, A. H., & Alshaya, F. S. (2012). Secondary school students’ alternative conceptions about genetics. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 16(1).
Anderson, S. P. (2011). Seductive interaction design: Creating playful, fun, and compelling user experiences. Pearson Education.
Annetta, L. A., Cheng, M.-T., & Holmes, S. (2010). Assessing twenty-first-century skills through a teacher-created video game for high school biology teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635141003748358
Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, R. M., & Perry, J. D. (1995). Theory into practice: How do we think? In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. Palgrave Macmillan.Past, present, and future (pp. 100–112). Libraries Unlimited.
Bergin, S., & Reilly, R. (2005). The influence of motivation and comfort-level on learning to program. In Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Psychology of Programming (PPIG’05) (pp. 293–304).
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2014, December 8). Partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/
Bowman, C. (2025, April 1). How multimedia and interactive technology transform engagement. eSchool News. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2025/04/01/multimedia-interactive-tech-student-engagement/
Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E. W., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., Manea, M., Kärki, A., & van Rosmalen, P. (2014). A narrative literature review of games, animations, and simulations to teach research methods and statistics. Computers & Education, 74, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.004
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Brown, J. S. (2005). New learning environments for the 21st century: Exploring the edge. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(5), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.37.5.18-24
Brown, D. E. (2005). The role of representations in teaching and learning science. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 9–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
Burhanuddin, N. A. N., Ahmad, N. A., Said, R. R., & Asimiran, S. (2021). Learning theories: Views from behaviourism theory and constructivism theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i1/8600
Department of Education (DepEd). (2016). K to 12 Curriculum Guide: Senior High School (STEM Strand). DepEd Philippines.
Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20312
Elangovan, R., & Ismail, Z. (2013). The effects of realistic simulation and non-realistic simulation on biology students’ achievement. Education, 3(4), 231–241. http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.edu.20130304.03.html
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
Frossard, F., Barajas, M., & Trifonova, A. (2012). A learner-centred game-design approach: Impacts on teachers’ creativity. Digital Education Review, 21, 13–22. https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/44803
Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul: Pleasure and learning. Common Ground Publishing.
Gosper, M., & McNeill, M. (2012). Implementing game-based learning: The MAPLET framework as a guide to learner-centred design and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives (pp. 217–233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_12
Kitiashvili, A. (2020). Shifting from a teacher-centred to a student-centred approach in the general education of Georgia: Attitudes and classroom practices of teachers. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 7(6), 552–564.
Klopfer, E., & Thompson, M. (2020). Game-based learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In J. L. Plass, R. E. Mayer, & B. D. Homer (Eds.), Handbook of game-based learning (pp. 387–407). MIT Press.
Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655969
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (1985). The learning style inventory: Technical manual. McBer.
Kumar, D. (2000). Pedagogical dimensions of game playing. ACM Intelligence Magazine, 10(1), 9–10.
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). All in the genes?—Young people’s understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655715
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000b). What’s in a cell?—Young people’s understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655722
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance—Do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
Li, M. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9436-x
McClarty, K. L., Orr, A., Frey, P. M., Dolan, R. P., Vassileva, V., & McVay, A. (2012). A literature review of gaming in education. Pearson. http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp-content/uploads/Lit_Review_of_Gaming_in_Education.pdf
McDonald, K., & Gomes, J. (2013). Evaluating student preparedness and conceptual change in introductory biology students studying gene expression. Journal of Transformative Leadership & Policy Studies, 3(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.36851/jtlps.v3i1.460
Muhajirah, M. (2020). Basic of learning theory: (Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism). International Journal of Asian Education, 1(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.23
Ng, C. H., & Adnan, M. (2018). Integrating STEM education through project-based inquiry learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020
Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining the university freshmen students’ misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and meiosis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677–3680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126
Oztap, H., Ozay, E., & Oztap, F. (2013). Teaching cell division to secondary school students: Misconceptions and learning difficulties. Journal of Biological Education, 47(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.764341
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman.
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
Piyayodilokchai, W., Panjaburee, P., Laosinchai, P., Ketpichainarong, W., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2013). Learning cycle approach for teaching Structured Query Language using interactive multimedia instructional units. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 149–158.
Prensky, M. (2011). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.
Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023
Ramsook, L. (2018). Cooperative learning as a constructivist strategy in tertiary education. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(12), 149–160.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X016009013
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play. MIT Press.
Salleh, W. N. W. M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Setyaningsih, E. (2021). Difficult topics in biology from the viewpoint of students and teachers based on KBSM implementation. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 8(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol8.1.6.2021
Saleem, A., Kausar, H., & Deeba, F. (2021). Social constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning environment. Perennial Journal of History, 2(2), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86
Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 503–524). Information Age.
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008019
Sung, H., & Hwang, G. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.019
U.S. Department of Education. (2010, November). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010-execsumm.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wisc-Online. (2024). Learning objects: Natural science – Cell division modules. Retrieved from https://www.wisc-online.com
Zemliansky, P., & Wilcox, D. (Eds.). (2010). Design and implementation of educational games: Theoretical and practical perspectives. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-781-7