Author
Aiden A. Pacaldo
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus
R. Palma St., Cebu City, Philippines
Email: aiden.pacaldo001@deped.gov.ph
Abstract
Teacher competence is the set of information, abilities, attitudes, and values that a teacher possesses and employs to effectively deliver lessons, manage a productive learning environment, support student progress, and adapt to varied teaching settings. This study investigated the competence of elementary teachers in implementing intervention strategies and its relationship to student academic performance in the Buenavista II District, Schools Division of Bohol during the School Year 2024–2025. The researcher employed a descriptive-correlational design and collected both qualitative and quantitative data through complete enumeration. The survey instrument was administered to 32 female teacher-respondents and measured three key domains: teacher attitude, subject knowledge, and pedagogical skills. The results showed a strong correlation between the efficacy of intervention techniques and teacher competency. With mean scores of 4.72 (attitude), 4.63 (subject knowledge), and 4.60 (pedagogical abilities), all of which were interpreted as “Strongly Agree,” the teachers showed a high degree of ability. Notwithstanding these advantages, the survey also noted a number of drawbacks, such as restricted opportunities for professional growth, sizable class sizes, a dearth of resources, and rising student emotional and behavioral demands. Nevertheless, the 96.88% attendance rate in in-service training demonstrated the teachers’ great dedication to ongoing growth. The results confirmed that student learning outcomes were greatly impacted by teacher competency when it was backed by pertinent training and resources. In order to guarantee the successful and long-lasting application of intervention techniques, the researchers placed a strong emphasis on bolstering professional development initiatives and removing contextual obstacles.
Keywords: Teacher competence, intervention strategies, academic performance, professional development, pedagogical skills, teacher attitude, subject knowledge, Elementary Education, Buenavista District, School Division of Bohol
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501730
Recommended citation:
Pacaldo, A. A. (2026). Teacher competence in the implementation of intervention strategies in Elementary Schools. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (1), 8061-8074. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501730
Read the full text
References
Adams, P. (2008). Considering “best practice”: The social construction of teacher activity and pupil learning as performance. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802287550
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Almenara, J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competence to assist students with functional diversity: Identification of factors through logistic regression methods. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13151
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Borko, H. (2006). Too little or too much: Teacher preparation and the first years of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106291976
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Darling-Hammond, L., & Oakes, J. (2021). Preparing teachers for deeper learning. Harvard Education Press.
De Guzman, S. F., Santos, M. L., & Torres, R. P. (2021). Teacher competence and the implementation of intervention strategies in elementary education in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 51(2), 98–112.
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 252–263.
Dias-Trindade, S., Moreira, J. A., & Ferreira, A. G. (2021). Assessment of teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education during pandemic times. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 43, e56383. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.56383
Gurian, M., Henley, P., & Trueman, T. (2008). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. Jossey-Bass.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Harvard University Press.
Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes, and efficacy. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Kennedy, A. (2016). How does professional learning change practice? Educational Research, 58(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1212170
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
Mafa-Theledi, O. N. (2024). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and subject matter content knowledge: Is the framework still relevant in STEM teaching? International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(4), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.804061
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725
Republic of the Philippines. (2001). Republic Act No. 9155: Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/08/11/republic-act-no-9155/
Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533: Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes and student outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801