ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043


> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

> Licensing Terms and Conditions
>
Copyright Policy


Latest Articles

Author

Elvin Jay H. Lava
Department of Education
Santa Rosa City, Laguna, Philippines
Email: elvin.lava@deped.gov.ph

Abstract

This study employed a quantitative-correlational research design to examine the relationship between teachers’ participation in School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) sessions and their teaching competency and professional practice in selected elementary schools in the Division of Santa Rosa, namely Santa Rosa Elementary School Central 1, Santa Rosa Elementary School Central 2, and Labas Elementary School. A total of 100 elementary school teachers who were actively engaged in SLAC activities served as respondents and were selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using a validated researcher-made questionnaire measuring SLAC participation in terms of attendance, engagement, functional role, and instructional application, as well as teaching competency and professional practice in areas such as instructional planning and delivery, pedagogical knowledge and strategies, assessment literacy, classroom management, reflective practice, collaboration, adherence to professional standards, and continuous professional development. Descriptive statistics, weighted mean, percentage, and Pearson correlation were utilized to analyze the data. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated a high level of SLAC participation and a generally high level of teaching competency and professional practice, with classroom management emerging as the strongest competency area. Results further showed no significant relationship between teachers’ demographic profile and their level of SLAC participation. However, a significant relationship was established between SLAC participation and all domains of teaching competency and professional practice, with functional role participation exhibiting the strongest association. These results indicate that increased and meaningful involvement in SLAC activities contributes to enhanced instructional competence and professional growth among teachers. The study concludes that SLAC serves as an effective collaborative professional development mechanism and provides empirical basis for the development of a metric framework to further strengthen SLAC implementation in elementary schools.

Keywords: School Learning Action Cell (SLAC), teaching competency, professional practice, participation, public school

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501744

Recommended citation:
Lava, E. J. H. (2026). School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) participation and teaching competency among elementary teachers. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (1), 8229-8238. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501744

Read the full text

References

Aclan, E. L., & Ching, R. A. (2022). School learning action cell: Its impact on teachers’ instructional competence and professional collaboration. Philippine Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 44–56.

Agustin, R. M., & Villareal, P. S. (2023). Collaborative lesson planning through SLAC: Building instructional alignment in Philippine public schools. Journal of Curriculum Development, 11(1), 91–108.

Alcantara, D. F., & Cruz, J. M. (2021). School-based learning action cells and the enhancement of classroom practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 287–303.

Antiola, M. A., & Ferenal, R. J. (2024). School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) as a professional development mechanism for teachers in Misamis Oriental. Asian Journal of Teacher Education, 5(1), 65–78.

Arriola, L. P., & Santos, C. D. (2023). From planning to delivery: How SLAC supports instructional practices in K–12 implementation. Philippine Educational Review, 15(2), 112–128.

Bajar, J. M., Bajar, M. A., & Alarcon, R. T. (2021). Strengthening pedagogical competence through SLAC: Addressing out-of-field teaching in rural schools. International Journal of Education Research, 9(3), 101–115.

Bautista, R. L. (2024). School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) participation as a predictor of instructional mastery among public school teachers. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 6(1), 55–72.

Castillo, V. R., & Dominguez, H. C. (2022). Teacher collaboration in School Learning Action Cells: Pedagogical innovations in Philippine classrooms. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 18(4), 55–71.

Cruz, M. P. (2023). Subject-specific School Learning Action Cell sessions and their effects on Araling Panlipunan teachers’ professional growth. Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 5(2), 110–127.

Dangcolis, R. (2024). Implementation of self-paced supplementary instructional material (SIM) in developing practical research skills among Grade 12 students. Pantao: International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.69651/pühss030313

Dela Cruz, R. B., & Uy, A. M. (2020). Pedagogical development in Philippine schools: The role of SLAC in shaping teacher strategies. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 6(2), 88–104.

De Jesus, L. A. (2022). School Learning Action Cell participation and instructional competence of public school teachers. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 6(3), 201–219.

De Leon, A. G., Ramirez, F. C., & Villoria, J. P. (2020). Integrating lesson study within School Learning Action Cell sessions: Effects on teachers’ instructional performance and professional growth. Philippine Journal of Teacher Development, 4(1), 25–44.

Erfe, J. R., & Gallego, M. C. (2025). Enhancing teachers’ instructional practices through School Learning Action Cell: A study on Araling Panlipunan teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Development, 12(1), 22–39.

Espino, D. R. (2021). School Learning Action Cell as in-service professional development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Professional Learning and Development, 3(2), 75–95.

Fernandez, G. T., & Ramos, I. E. (2022). SLAC as a platform for inclusive pedagogy and differentiated instruction. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 4(3), 67–82.

Garcia, A. P., & Lim, S. C. (2023). Teacher professional growth through SLAC: Insights on assessment practices. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 19(1), 135–152.

Lorenzo, F. J., & Bautista, K. L. (2024). Integrating formative assessment strategies through SLAC in junior high schools. International Journal of Assessment in Education, 13(2), 75–93.

Magundayao, A. B. (2024). The role of School Learning Action Cell in improving teacher performance in the Northwest District of Ilagan. Philippine Journal of Research in Education, 8(2), 55–72.

Manalo, J. S. (2024). The role of School Learning Action Cell in strengthening ICT integration and teacher professional growth. Asian Journal of Educational Research and Policy, 12(1), 88–104.

Manalo, J. T., & Quiambao, N. F. (2021). Developing classroom assessment literacy among teachers through SLAC. Asian Journal of Educational Studies, 10(1), 41–59.

Pacheco, R. M. (2021). Teachers’ lived experiences in School Learning Action Cell participation: A phenomenological study. Philippine Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 2(1), 33–49.

Pal, R. S. (2025). Pedagogical growth and classroom management improvement among mathematics teachers through SLAC. Asian Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1), 73–91.

Reyes, M. C., & Dizon, R. P. (2020). SLAC and its contribution to teacher evaluation literacy in secondary schools. Philippine Education Studies Journal, 5(2), 64–79.

Rivera, C. V. (2023). The impact of School Learning Action Cell on the instructional practices of mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Education and Practice, 7(2), 140–156.

Santos, J. F., & Hernandez, K. B. (2023). Building classroom communities: SLAC as a tool for improving management practices. Journal of Educational Leadership and Practice, 17(4), 201–218.

Santos, P. J. (2021). Effectiveness of School Learning Action Cells: Variations across schools and clusters. Journal of Education Administration and Supervision, 5(1), 65–83.

Tolentino, A. S., & Yuzon, M. C. (2021). Teacher collaboration and classroom management: The role of School Learning Action Cells. Asia Pacific Journal of Classroom Research, 8(2), 122–139.

Tomogon, R. L., & Lactam, J. P. (2024). SLAC participation and teachers’ instructional mastery: Implications for pedagogical efficacy. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Development, 6(4), 33–49.

Velasco, H. G., & Ong, M. L. (2025). Sustaining positive classroom climates through SLAC interventions. Journal of Classroom Dynamics, 14(1), 88–105.

Villanueva, K. R. (2022). School Learning Action Cell as a professional learning community: A synthesis of evaluation studies. Philippine Educational Review, 8(2), 98–115.

Published in

Discover more from Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading