Authors
Ritchele B. Borres*
Cebu Technological University
Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
Email: ritcheleberjame9@gmail.com
Minerva C. Soco
Cebu Technological University
Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
Milagrosa G. Ortega
Cebu Technological University
Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
Sarah P. De La Torre
Cebu Technological University
Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between teaching styles and classroom management strategies of junior high school mathematics teachers and student academic performance. A descriptive-correlational quantitative design was employed with 324 students from a public secondary night school in Cebu City, Philippines, selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a validated survey questionnaire adapted from the Grasha–Riechmann Teaching Style Inventory (1996) and Tacadena (2021), with students’ first-quarter mathematics grades serving as the performance measure. Pearson product-moment correlation analysis revealed that all five teaching styles (Expert, Formal Authority, Personal Model, Facilitator, Delegator) demonstrated statistically significant but weak positive correlations with achievement, with Formal Authority (r = 0.318) and Expert (r = 0.277) styles showing the strongest relationships. Among classroom management strategies, Planning (r = 0.337), Time Management (r = 0.292), Discipline (r = 0.237), and Students’ Emotional Aspect (r = 0.223) showed significant positive correlations, while Learning Environment did not yield significant relationships. Students demonstrated favorable performance (M = 85.61, SD = 0.80). Findings feature that effective mathematics instruction requires multifaceted approaches integrating structured teaching, strategic planning, efficient time management, emotional support, and consistent discipline. Results support the implementation of a comprehensive action plan addressing identified teacher weaknesses and promoting blended teaching approaches responsive to diverse student needs.
Keywords: Teaching mathematics, teaching styles, classroom management, mathematics achievement, descriptive-correlational design, Cebu City, Philippines
*Corresponding author
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404616
Recommended citation:
Borres, R. B., Soco, M. C., Ortega, M. G., & De La Torre, S. P. (2025). Mathematics teaching styles, classroom management strategies, and students’ academic performance. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (4), 6700-6726. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404616
Read the full text
References
Abdissa, D. G., Duressa, G. F., Olkaba, T. T., & Feyissa, E. G. (2025). The effect of blended learning educational model on secondary school students’ mathematics achievement. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 83(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/25.83.09
Ahmed, S., Farooqi, M. T. K., & Iqbal, A. (2021). A study of teachers’ teaching styles and students’ performance. Ilkogretim Online – Elementary Education Online, 20(2), 1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.124
Akinyemi, I. A., Gbesoevi, E. S., & Afolabi, S. A. (2024). Exploring classroom environment as a predominant factor affecting students’ academic performance in Lagos State junior secondary schools, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Learning Research, 1(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.62208/jelr.1.2.p.70-81
Amasha, M., & Assadi, N. (2024). Teaching styles and self-efficacy as burnout predictors among teachers in Arab schools in Israel. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17210a
Anisah, S., Syahid, A., & Mirza, A. A. (2025). The correlation between English classroom environment and learning motivation on EFL secondary school students. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(2), 503–514. https://jele.or.id/index.php/jele/article/view/785
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
Chow, J. C., Sayers, R., Fu, Y., Granger, K. L., McCullough, S., Kingsbery, C., & Morse, A. (2024). A systematic meta-review of measures of classroom management in school settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 49(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231208671
Cole, K., Schroeder, K., Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Flexible seating impact on classroom environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 62–70. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1304613.pdf
Cuabo, F. M. P., Mangulad, K. P., Palisbo, J. T., Bacus, J. A., Baluyos, G. R., Entera, R. C., & Beringuel, E. G. (2024). Teachers’ classroom management, students’ attitude and home environment: Predictors of mathematics performance. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3), 1208–1227. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803090
De Bortoli, L., Underwood, C., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2024). PISA 2022: Reporting Australia’s results. Volume II: Student and school characteristics. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-726-7
Department of Education. (2017). DO 42, s. 2017 – National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. https://tinyurl.com/BEDSO1
Department of Education. (2019). DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019: Policy guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://tinyurl.com/BEDSO3
Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum (DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024). https://tinyurl.com/borres22
Dijk, W., Gage, N. A., & Grasley, B. N. (2019). The relation between classroom management and mathematics achievement: A multilevel structural equation model. Psychology in the Schools, 56(7), 1173–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22254
Elbertson, N. A., Jennings, P. A., & Brackett, M. A. (2025). The role of educators in school-based social and emotional learning. Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy, 6, 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2025.100134
Espinosa Andrade, A., Padilla, L., & Carrington, S. J. (2024). Educational spaces: The relation between school infrastructure and learning outcomes. Heliyon, 10(19), e38361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38361
Estipona, E. P., & Delos Santos, M. S. M. (2025). Linking wellbeing to success: Life satisfaction on mathematics performance of Philippine public high school students. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1540813. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1540813
Fadda, D., Pellegrini, M., Vivanet, G., & Zandonella Callegher, C. (2022). Effects of digital games on student motivation in mathematics: A meta-analysis in K–12. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12618
Fitz, J. (with Price, H.). (2025). Positive conditions for mathematics learning: An overview of the research. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/967.472
Frazier, A. Y. (2020). The impact of blended learning upon mathematics attitudes and academic achievement: An action research study (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina). Scholar Commons. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/6144
Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Teachers as facilitators and innovators in 21st-century STEM education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), ep25014. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/17245
Gegg, D. L. (2020). The impact of middle school scheduling practices on adolescent math achievement in Louisiana public schools (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University). Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/dissertations/46
Gracin, D. G., & Trupčević, G. (2022). Time as a resource in mathematics education: Teachers’ perspectives. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263221109034
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Alliance Publishers.
Greenberg, M. T. (2023). Evidence for social and emotional learning in schools. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/928.269
Han, T., & Xu, G. (2025). The relationship between learning environment perception, achievement goals, and the undergraduate deep learning approach: A longitudinal mediation model. Journal of Intelligence, 13(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020019
Hariri, D. D., Mahmudah, H., Wibawa, F. S., & Kania, N. (2025). Unraveling the connection: A systematic review of learning styles and mathematics achievement. Pedagogical Research, 10(1), em0232. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15681
Hayati, N., Surat, S., & Noer, M. A. (2021). Relationship of teaching style towards elementary school achievement of students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/9726
Heaney, D. J. (2024). Evaluating the impact of block scheduling mathematics at the Palmerton Area Junior High School (Doctoral capstone project). Pennsylvania Western University. https://jetty.klnpa.org/_flysystem/fedora/2024-09/HeaneyCapstone.pdf
Jahnke, J. F. (2025). Emotional intelligence in math classes: A way to overcome anxieties and strengthen skills. Revista Aracê, 7(3), 10297–10313. https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n3-010
Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lee, H.-J., & Herner-Patnode, L. (2025). Equitable mathematics teaching for diverse learners: Connecting preservice teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 14(1), 38–57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1471807.pdf
Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., & Mu, X. (2022). How classroom environment influences academic enjoyment in mathematics among Chinese middle school students: Moderated mediation effect of academic self-concept and academic achievement. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2035–2048. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S371092
Livet, M., & Ward, C. (2025). Defining effective curriculum implementation: Insights from the EIC Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://tinyurl.com/BOREF3
Lumbre, A., Joaquin, M. N. B., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2023). Relationship between mathematics teachers’ teaching styles and students’ achievement in mathematics. Athens Journal of Sciences, 10(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.10-1-1
Malhotra, S. (2025). The influence of block schedules on student performance in California. Critical Debates HSGJ. https://tinyurl.com/BOREF1
Martin, J. E. (2019). Perceived teaching style and academic growth in an international school setting (Doctoral dissertation, Western Kentucky University). WKU Scholarship. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/diss/169
Mengullo, A. O., & Fuentes, H. C. (2024). Factors affecting the academic achievement in mathematics of Grade 10 students in Barobo National High School, Llorente, Eastern Samar, Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(12), 2857–2868. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120238
Meyer, L., Fesler, L., Gu, A., & Lauver, C. (2024). Impacts of blended learning tutoring models on math achievement after COVID-19: Results from Saga Education. Mathematica®. https://tinyurl.com/BOREF2
Molyneux, T. M., & Diamond, A. (2025). Integrating social and emotional learning into mathematics education: A multiple case study of JUMP Math’s approach to creating socially and emotionally supportive learning environments. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101426
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
OECD. (2025). Future-focused mathematics curricula: Empowering learners for the 21st century (OECD Education Spotlights No. 18). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/18036510-en
Oligo, J. B., & Valderama, J. S. (2025). Influence of teachers’ teaching styles on students’ academic performance through structural equation modelling. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 23(1), 3328–3337. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2025-23.1.00264
Pathuddin, Rahmawati, S., Ikfal, Sukayasa, & M, B. (2025). The effect of time management and interest in learning mathematics: A case study of senior high school students in Palu, Indonesia on students’ learning achievement. Heliyon, 11(3), e42048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42048
Petre, C., & Crăciun, M. A. (2024). The impact of delegator teaching style on the motivation to achieve of primary level students. Black Sea Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 115–124. https://www.bspsychology.ro
Piosang, T. (2025). ‘Money’ matters: Estimating the causal impact of socioeconomic status on mathematics achievement in the Philippines using large-scale assessment data. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2025.2470047
Podiya, J. K., Navaneetham, J., & Bhola, P. (2025). Influences of school climate on emotional health and academic achievement of school-going adolescents in India: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21268-0
Putra, E., & Yanto, M. (2025). Classroom management: Boosting student success—A meta-analysis review. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2458630
Quibrar, R. D., Abbas, A., Alviola, J. P., Balate, N. J., Balicog, A. K., Damasin, A., Jopia, J. C., Labawan, A., Lico, J. M., Quibol, R., Sigue, A., Clamares, K. J. M., & Pelandas, A. M. O. (2024). Learning style and teaching style as determining factors in academic performance of senior high school. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(4), 2107–2115. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.804232
Rampersad, N., Gcabashe, N., Chetty, D., Dubazane, F. S., Lafitte, C., Ndwandwe, Z., Rauff, F. Z., Sibiya, P., & Tembe, A. (2024). Teaching style preferences and online teaching practices of optometry teachers during COVID-19: A preliminary study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 15, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S436118
Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). An act instituting a framework of governance for basic education, establishing authority and accountability, renaming the Department of Education, Culture and Sports as the Department of Education, and for other purposes. https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/7353
Republic of the Philippines. (2001). Republic Act No. 9155: Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. https://tinyurl.com/BEDSO4
Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533: Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
Ridwan, M. R., Hadi, S., & Jailani, J. (2022). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of a cooperative learning model on vocational high school students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 396–421. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.97.9.4
Sakellariou, C. (2022). The reciprocal relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performance in U.S. high school students: Instrumental variables estimates and gender differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941253
Salhani, I. (2019). Jumlah pelajar mengambil STEM kian merosot. Berita Harian, 12, 18.
Scalise, N. R., Gladstone, J. R., & Miller-Cotto, D. (2025). Maximizing math achievement: Strategies from the science of learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 257, 106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106281
Seitz, S., Häsel-Weide, U., Wilke, Y., & Wallner, M. (2023). Expertise and professionalism for inclusive (mathematics) teaching and learning: Reflections on findings from interdisciplinary professionalisation research. Teachers and Teaching, 31(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2284876
Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
Siller, H.-S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade six students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14153
Sim, S. H., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2022). The relationship of Grasha–Riechmann teaching styles with teaching experience of national-type Chinese primary schools’ mathematics teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1028145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028145
Tacadena, J. E. (2021). Classroom management and students’ learning in mathematics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(3), 418–423. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2021.5328
Tulang, A. B. (2021). Blended teaching styles: Its influence in fractal student achievement. Science International (Lahore), 33(3), 191–196. https://www.sci-int.com/pdf/637602096083495385.%20Tulang-EDU-PHILIP-2-6-21.edited-PAID.pdf
Wang, C., Li, X. Y., & Lin, X. Y. (2025). Peer support as a buffer: Reducing math anxiety through psychological resilience in left-behind rural students. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 715. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05075-5
Wang, Q., & Abdullah, A. H. (2024). Enhancing students’ critical thinking through mathematics in higher education: A systemic review. Sage Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241275651
Wilson, P. H., Mawhinney, K., McCulloch, A., Schwartz, C., Stephan, M., Adefope, O., Fisher, C., Holl-Cross, C., & Oriowo, L. (2024). Findings from a state study of visions of high-quality mathematics instruction. North Carolina Collaborative for Mathematics Learning.
Yin, H., Shi, L., Tam, W. W. Y., & Lu, G. (2020). Linking university mathematics classroom environments to student achievement: The mediation of mathematics beliefs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100905