ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043


> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

> Licensing Terms and Conditions
>
Copyright Policy


Latest Articles

Author

Carolene N. Cuaca
Cebu Normal University, College of Teacher Education
Cebu City, Philippines
Email: cuacacarolene@gmail.com

Abstract

This meta-synthesis explores the evolving landscape of assessment techniques in literature teaching, emphasizing the transition from traditional evaluation methods to innovative, technology-driven approaches aligned with 21st-century learning needs. The study systematically reviewed twelve qualitative and mixed-method studies published between 2018 and 2024 from reputable databases. Using Noblit and Hare’s (1988) meta-ethnographic framework, the findings reveal a significant shift toward formative and authentic assessments including portfolios, peer assessments, and digital tools that foster deeper comprehension, creativity, and learner autonomy. While technology-enhanced assessments have improved engagement, challenges persist regarding teacher preparedness, technological access, and training alignment with learning outcomes. The study concludes with the proposed Literature Engagement and Assessment Model (LEAM), which integrates preparation, instruction, and evaluation as core components of effective and inclusive assessment practice. The findings highlight the need for professional development, equitable access to digital resources, and structured instructional models that promote critical thinking and student empowerment in literature education.

Keywords: assessment in literature, authentic assessment, digital tools in teaching, meta-synthesis, literature pedagogy, formative evaluation

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404559

Recommended citation:

Cuaca, C. N. (2025). Assessment techniques in literature teaching: A meta-synthesis. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (4), 6078-6084. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404559

Read the full text

References

Albatool, A. M. A., & Moneus, A. M. A. (2023). Towards interactive teaching strategies in teaching English literature. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(8), 1912–1919. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.06

Benonguil, J. A., & Barnido, J. (2022). Teachers’ instructional approaches in teaching literary texts in an ESL classroom: Learners’ impressions at core. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 4(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v4i2.948

Devaki, V. (2024). Exploring the impact of innovative assessment methods on learning outcomes. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3645-8.ch015

Guillamón, L. T., Martínez, A. C., & García, M. E. C. (2019). Use of literature, resources and innovative methodologies in the English classroom. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 32, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.30827/pl.v0i32.13699

Lorenzo, A. (2022). Strategies in teaching 21st century literature: Results from a systematic review of literature. Deleted Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56901/seen3426

Magulod, G. C. (2018). Innovative learning tasks in enhancing the literary appreciation skills of students. SAGE Open, 8(4), 215824401882038. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018820382

Mansory, M. (2020). The significance of non-traditional and alternative assessment in English language teaching: Evidence from literature. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(5), 210. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i5.17782

Muhaimi, L., et al. (2023). The implementation of authentic assessment in the literary subjects. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1.1173

Muho, A., & Taraj, G. (2022). Impact of formative assessment practices on student motivation for learning the English language. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i1.2842

Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. SAGE Publications.

Rifqi, M. (2023). Students’ motivation and engagement in the learning process of literature teaching. EduLite, 8(2), 280–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.8.2.280-294

Saragih, S., & Ena, O. (2024). The use of ICT tools in teaching English literature: A meta-analysis study. EduInovasi Journal of Basic Educational Studies, 4(2), 1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.47467/edu.v4i2.2994

Sembiring, S. (2024). Practical application of assessment theories for English teachers through digital technologies. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 15(2), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v15i2.830

Published in

Discover more from Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading