ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043


> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

> Licensing Terms and Conditions
>
Copyright Policy


Latest Articles

Keichie R. Quimco*, and Regina P. Galigao (Authors)

Abstract

In the framework of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE), this research examines the value of learner autonomy and independent learning techniques in raising student achievement and critical thinking. In light of the changing nature of education, it looks at a number of pedagogical strategies, including Learner-Centred Pedagogy, Digital Learning Platforms, Cooperative Learning, Communal Constructivism, the Dynamic Learning Program (DLP), E-Learning, and Problem-Based Learning (PBL). This research emphasizes how these pedagogies promote self-directed learning, motivation, engagement, and academic performance through a qualitative examination of secondary data and international literature. Results show that independent learning enhances cognitive and metacognitive abilities while also giving TLE students the self-reliance and practical skills they need for lifetime learning and real-world application. In order to serve varied learners in a range of sociocultural contexts, the research emphasizes the importance of teachers acting as facilitators and the necessity of flexible, resource-sensitive pedagogies. The findings support the idea that encouraging learner autonomy is essential to attaining sustainability and quality in education.

Keywords: learner autonomy, independent learning, Technology and Livelihood Education, Problem-Based Learning, Digital Learning Platforms, Cooperative Learning, Dynamic Learning Program, self-directed learning, critical thinking, student engagement, pedagogy, educational outcomes, experiential learning

*Corresponding author

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403413

Recommended citation:

Quimco, K. R., & Galigao R. P. (2025). Examining independent learning strategies and its impact to student achievement and engagement in Technology and Livelihood Education. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (3), 4443-4453. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403413

Read the full text

References

Abayari, L. C. (2025). Innovative technology skills of Technology and Livelihood Education teacher on the student engagement and performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 8(1), 629–636.

Almasri, M., Savyrydiuk, O., & Rashid, T. (2019). Digital platforms supporting self-directed learning in crisis regions. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 85–98.

Asenorio, V. M. P., Dela Rosa, L. B., Dinagsao, D. M. M., Laranio, H. I., Miague, N. B. D., Polestico, J. J., & Ucang, J. T. (2022). Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and student’s academic performance on Dynamic Learning Program. International Journal of Applied Science and Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.56293/IJASR.2022.5403

Alzukari, R. (2024). Academic self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and academic success of international graduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University).

Baytiyeh, H. (2017). The flipped classroom model and its impact on student engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development.

Bernido, C. C., & Carpio-Bernido, M. V. (2011). CVIF Dynamic Learning Program: A systems approach to process-induced learning. Presented at epiSTEME 4: International Conference to Review Research on Science, Technology, and Mathematics Education.

Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1991). The challenge of problem based learning (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

BMJ. (2003). Problem based learning. BMJ, 326(7384), 328. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328

Smith, J. A. (2020). The impact of independent learning on student engagement and academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000400

CITE. (2020). How Dynamic Learning Program revolutionized learning.

Chica, R. C. Jr. (2025). Seven characteristics of independent learners. https://www.scribd.com/document/550524254/SEVEN-CHARACTERISTICS-OF-INDEPENDENT-LEARNERS-1

Dela Cruz, M. A. D. R., & Salazar, P. R. (2023). Challenges of integrating technology in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE): Perspectives from Philippine secondary schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(6), 69–87. https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/DigitalLibrary/volume-10-issue-6/69-87.pdf

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum – Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/MATATAG-EPP_TLE-CG-Grades-4-and-7.pdf

Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303049

Hallinger, P., & Bridges, E. (2007). A leadership perspective on the implementation of problem-based learning in schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207075970

Hallinger, P. (2010). Learning to lead organizational change: Assessment of a problem-based simulation in Thailand. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(5), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210373736

Hallinger, P., & Bridges, E. (2010). Implementing problem-based learning: Lessons from international case studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(4), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120903428237

Jacolbia, R. B. (2016). Future educators’ perceptions on technology and livelihood education status and development of work skills. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 85–91.

Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y. S., & Ho, C. M. L. (2009). Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(2), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.009

Leavy, J. E., Della Bona, M., Nelson, B., & Leaversuch, F. (2022). A comparison of face-to-face and fully online problem-based learning: Student results and staff experiences, 2014–2020. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 33(S1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.636

Kaltura. (2024). Independent learning: What it is and how it works. https://corp.kaltura.com/blog/independent-learning/

Margetson, D. (1991). Why is problem-based learning a challenge? In D. Boud & G. Feletti (Eds.), The challenge of problem-based learning (pp. 36–44). Kogan Page.

MIT Teaching & Learning Lab. (2023, January 31). Help students retain, organize and integrate knowledge. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://tll.mit.edu/teaching-resources/how-to-teach/help-students-retain-organize-and-integrate-knowledge/

Nurhayati, L., & Bahtiar, S. (2024). Independent learning and its impact on problem-solving skills among university students. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijep.v13i1.57689

Prayekti, S. (2018). The effect of independent learning on student academic achievement and self-regulation. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jere.v2i1.18701

Published in

Discover more from Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading