ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043


> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877 | e-ISSN 3155-6043, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.

> Licensing Terms and Conditions
>
Copyright Policy


Latest Articles

Authors

Reymark A. Luna*
Teacher III/Maddela Comprehensive High School, Poblacion Norte, Maddela, Quirino, Philippines

Nilda O. Babaran, PhD
Professor I/Isabela State University-Main Campus, San Fabian, Echague, Isabela, Philippines

Abstract

This study investigated the challenges encountered by Social Studies teachers in integrating gender equality topics in Maddela District I, Quirino, and used the identified challenges as the basis for developing a proposed gender-responsive instructional material. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, and total population sampling was used to include 30 Social Studies teacher-respondents from three public secondary schools. Data were gathered through a validated survey questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, then analyzed using descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis. Results revealed that all four challenge dimensions were rated at the Agree to Strongly Agree level: pedagogical strategies posted the highest mean (M = 3.25), followed by socio-cultural factors (M = 3.14), instructional materials (M = 3.07), and institutional support (M = 3.05). The most critical barriers were limited training on gender-responsive teaching methods, absence of locally developed and curriculum-aligned materials, weak institutional monitoring, and deeply embedded community gender norms. Despite these challenges, teachers demonstrated a strong commitment to gender-responsive practice, with an overall teaching practices mean of 3.49. Thematic analysis generated four themes: structural and socio-cultural constraints hinder integration; inclusive and participatory strategies are the primary mode of practice; teachers need concrete curriculum-embedded support; and effective materials must be inclusive, stereotype-free, contextualized, and curriculum-aligned. The findings underscore the urgent need for systematically developed gender-responsive instructional materials and sustained professional development to bridge the gap between gender equality policy and actual classroom practice in rural Philippine schools.

Keywords: Gender equality, gender-responsive teaching, Social Studies education, instructional material.

*Corresponding author / Email: reymark.luna@deped.gov.ph
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05021073

Recommended citation:
Luna, R. A., & Babaran, N. O. (2026). Challenges in integrating gender equality teaching in social studies: Basis for development of gender-responsive instructional material. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (2), 2870-2889. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS05021073

Read the full text

References

Abraha, A. A., Belay, M. M., & Tesfay, H. T. (2019). Gender-responsive pedagogy: Teachers’ reflections and classroom practices in Ethiopia. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.72.74.85

Abraha, M., Seifu, A., & Dagnew, A. (2021). Manifestation of the FAWE’s gender responsive pedagogy in the Ethiopian general secondary school science teaching. International Journal of Management, 12(1), 1560–1571. https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJM/VOLUME_12_ISSUE_1/IJM_12_01_138.pdf

Abraha, T., Belay, E., & Tesfay, H. (2019). Teachers’ awareness and practice of gender-responsive pedagogy in secondary schools in Ethiopia. Gender and Education, 31(4), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1544361

Acar Erdol, T., & Özen, F. (2022). Gender equality perceptions of preservice teachers: Are they ready to teach it? Social Psychology of Education, 25(3), 793–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09712-8

Alejo, E. M. G., & Hermosa, J. P. (2025). Integrative learning approaches in fostering gender equality competence. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(2), 718–735. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.02.22

Blumberg, R. L. (2021). Gender bias in textbooks: A hidden obstacle on the road to gender equality in education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cagayan, M. S., & Neri, R. J. (2024). Gender equality and education disparities in Southeast Asia: A regional analysis. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(1), 67–79. https://www.ijble.com/index.php/bec/article/view/1134

Canuto, J. A., & Espique, R. A. (2023). Gender equality in science classrooms: Examining the implementation of gender-responsive approaches and their impact on students’ learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7), 86–103. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/download/7624/pdf

Chapin, J., & Warne, V. (2020). Gender responsive pedagogy in higher education: A framework. INASP. https://www.inasp.info/sites/default/files/2021-01/Gender%20responsive%20pedagogy%20Framework%20paper.pdf

Connell, R. (2021). Gender in world perspective (4th ed.). Polity Press.

Cordonia, C., Chiner, E., Renata, T., Faubel, J., Abery, B., & Henriquez, S. (2025). Teacher educators’ perceptions of factors influencing gender mainstreaming implementation in university teaching 30 years after Beijing. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 25(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v25i1.1005

Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching quality around the world. European Journal of Education, 56(4), 498–513.

Davis, M. (2023). Pedagogy for social justice: Expanding the scope of gender-responsive teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(1), 1–18.

Department of Education. (2017). Gender-responsive basic education policy (DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2017). Department of Education Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Department of Education. (2024). School as a safe space through gender-responsive basic education policy. Educational Challenges, 5(2), 141–156. https://educationalchallenges.org.ua/index.php/education_challenges/article/view/296

Frontiers in Education. (2025). Teaching gender equality in teacher education: Does existing practice actually support gender-mainstreaming implementation? Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1570115. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1570115

Gul, F. (2025). Representation of gender roles in social-science learning modules: A content analysis. Asian Journal of Social Studies, 9(2), 22–35.

Gul, S. (2025). Gender equality in education: Addressing structural barriers and social norms. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. http://thecrsss.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/361

Human Rights Watch. (2023). “All we want is equality”: LGBTQIA+ youth in Philippine schools. Human Rights Watch.

Java, E. M., & Parcon, M. E. (2016). Gender representation in Philippine secondary textbooks. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0280-9

Kalra, D., Sumaiya, B., Kumar, S., Talwar, P., & Saini, R. (2023). A comparative framework of gender sensitive factors affecting gender sensitivity in schools of Delhi. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.48047/INT-JECSE/V13I1.211197

Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Lamptey, A., Gaidzanwa, R. B., Mulugeta, E., Samra, S., Shumba, O., Assie-Lumumba, N. D. T., Oliphant, J., Sunnari, V., Ssereo, F., & Kurki, T. (2015). A guide for gender equality in teacher education policy and practices. UNESCO. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/10138/314497/1/231646eng.pdf

Le Mat, M. (2022). Teaching gender: A pedagogical framework for addressing gender and sexuality diversity in schools. Gender and Education, 34(3), 287–303.

Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2022). Gender representations in Hong Kong English textbooks. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 21(2), 92–106.

Lindsay, S., Rezai, M., Kolne, K., & Osten, V. (2019). Outcomes of gender-sensitivity educational interventions for healthcare providers: A systematic review. Health Education Journal, 78(8), 958–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896919859908

Mendizabal, R. M. (2025). Teachers’ hesitations in integrating gender-fair education in Philippine classrooms. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(1), 56–71.

Mendizabal, R. N. (2025). Teachers’ challenges and strategies in fostering gender equality in the classroom. The LAMP, Quezon City University. https://qcu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/THE-LAMP-10-29.pdf

Meyer, E. J. (2020). Gender and sexual diversity in schools. Springer.

Mokhtar, F., Rahman, A. H., & Harun, N. A. (2021). Challenges in implementing gender-responsive teaching among Malaysian educators. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8921

Mokhtar, N., Ahmad, R., & Hassan, S. (2021). Barriers to gender-sensitive teaching: A study among secondary school teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.73.200.208

Munir, A., & Noreen, S. (2020). Gender bias in Pakistani secondary school textbooks: A content analysis. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Education Review, 1(2), 23–36.

Nguyen, T. H. (2023). Gender responsiveness in Southeast Asian teacher education: Gaps and possibilities. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, Article 102757.

Philippine Commission on Women. (2025). Joint memorandum circular no. 2025-03: Guidelines on gender-fair assessment and instructional materials. https://pcw.gov.ph/pcw-deped-ched-tesda-jmc-2025-03

Philippine Information Agency. (2025). DepEd and PCW launch gender-responsive assessment toolkit for instructional materials. https://pia.gov.ph/breaking-educational-barriers-pcw-and-partners-launches-first-ever-gender-responsive-assessment-tools-for-evaluating-instructional-materials

Rahman, M. (2023). Gender representation in Bangladeshi secondary school textbooks: A critical discourse analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies, 12(1), 72–85.

Robinson, K. H. (2022). Innocence, knowledge, and the construction of childhood: The contradictory nature of sexuality and censorship in the education of young people. Routledge.

Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. (2020). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats boys and girls in school and what we can do about it. Scribner.

Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Sebastian, J. G., Reyes, A. M., & Cruz, R. L. (2024). Navigating gender-responsive teaching in conservative communities: Insights from rural Filipino educators. Philippine Journal of Social Development, 16(1), 33–50.

Stromquist, N. P. (2020). Feminist organizations and social transformation in Latin America. Routledge.

Sultana, A. (2024). Gender bias in Bangladeshi and Indonesian primary textbooks: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, Article 100336.

UNESCO. (2021). Gender equality in education: Global progress and challenges. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Gender report – deepening the debate on those still left behind. UNESCO.

Unterhalter, E. (2020). The many meanings of quality education: Politics of targets and indicators in SDG 4. Global Policy, 10(S1), 39–54.

Unterhalter, E., & North, A. (2021). Responding to the gender and education millennium development goal: Analysing knowledge production and policy debate at the global level. Compare, 51(1), 1–16.

Upsi University. (2023). A curriculum model for technical-vocational teacher education and its gender integration gap. Journal of Research, Policy and Teacher Training, 18(4), 43–58. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JRPPTTE/article/view/7439

Villegas, D. C., Entienza, P. S. V., Lonzaga, M. A. S., Medina, H. P. D., & Oruga, R. L. (2025). Awareness and implementation of gender-responsive basic education policy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2025.6.1.65-77

Villegas, J. C., De Vera, K. L., & Ramos, C. J. (2025). Implementation gaps of gender-responsive education in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Education and Development, 15(2), 88–104.

Yildirim, A., & Tas, M. (2020). Teachers’ demographic characteristics and their influence on gender-sensitive teaching practices. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 10(2), 12–19.

Yildirim, T., & Tas, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of gender equality and their classroom practices: The influence of age and experience. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1

Published in

Discover more from Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading