The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors

> Peer Review Policy
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.


Latest Articles

Author

Linabille D. Feble*
Capiz State University – Main Campus, Roxas City, Capiz, Philippines

Abstract

This qualitative case study investigated teachers’ implementation, strategies, and challenges in carrying out the Revised K to 12 (MATATAG) Curriculum in the Division of Roxas City during School Year 2024–2025. It also identified considerations necessary for the curriculum’s sustainability. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion involving 14 teacher-participants and seven school heads from selected public elementary schools. Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework was employed to analyze the data. Findings revealed that teachers implemented the curriculum through five approaches: ensuring curriculum alignment with learning standards, fostering professional collaboration and shared responsibility, embracing innovative and learner-centered instructional strategies, strengthening teacher capacity through continuous training and preparation, and contextualizing curriculum implementation across subject areas. Teachers employed twelve instructional strategies, including collaborative learning, differentiated instruction, learning by doing, storytelling and role-playing, technology integration, values education, contextualization and localization, scaffolding, activity-based strategies, project-based learning, resourcefulness, and teacher collaboration. Nine challenges were identified: curriculum transition and adjustment, resource limitations, teacher workload and preparation, limited parental involvement, learner diversity, assessment and grading constraints, insufficient training and professional development, time constraints, and administrative burden. To sustain effective implementation, teachers emphasized six key considerations: teacher commitment and professionalism, instructional improvement, collaboration and support systems, provision of resources, capacity building and training, and policy and systemic support. The study concludes that sustaining the MATATAG Curriculum requires a multi-dimensional support framework that addresses both classroom-level realities and systemic institutional needs.

Keywords: MATATAG Curriculum, curriculum implementation, instructional strategies, curriculum challenges, curriculum sustainability

*Corresponding author/ Email: linabille.feble001@deped.gov.ph
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0502972

Recommended citation:
Feble, L. D. (2026). Revised K to 12 (MATATAG) curriculum: Implementation, strategies, challenges, and sustainability. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (2), 1187-1212. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0502972

Read the full text

References

Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438–441.

Aguilar, T. (2019). Aligning teaching methods with curriculum content for effective learning outcomes. Philippine Educational Insights, 33(3), 63–78.

Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2020). Teacher adoption of technology: Factors and mindsets. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 105893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106232

Almazan, J. S., Dela Cruz, F. A., & Ponce, M. C. (2020). Aligning teaching strategies with learning competencies: A key to effective instruction. Philippine Journal of Education, 98(2), 45–60.

Almonte-Acosta, S. A. (2016). The problem of time: A barrier to meaningful learning in Philippine classrooms. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(2), 20–30.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2016). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education.

Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns-based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331–367.

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.

Baker, E. L., O’Neil, H. F., & Linn, R. L. (2022). Measuring educational quality: A holistic approach to curriculum evaluation. Educational Measurement Journal, 40(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654322110001

Baker, R. S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Paquette, L. (2022). Learning analytics to support student engagement and skill development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000672

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (2015). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). Jossey-Bass.

Ball, D. L., & Tyson, K. (2019). Teacher learning and curriculum reform: Managing complexity and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(4), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1557640

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Baroody, A. J., Lai, M.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2016). The role of conceptual knowledge in mathematics learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207539

Batas Pambansa Blg. 232. (1982). An act providing for the establishment and maintenance of an integrated system of education.

Bautista, M. C., & Villanueva, R. L. (2021). Infrastructure gaps and their effect on public school implementation of K to 12 reforms. Philippine Journal of Education and Development, 45(2), 88–105.

Bautista, M. C. R., & Tan, C. P. (2019). Challenges in the Philippine education system: A review of structural issues. Philippine Journal of Education, 91(2), 56–72.

Bernardo, A. B. I., & Sevilla, D. R. (2019). Barriers to curriculum reform in Philippine public schools: Perspectives from educators. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09586-5

Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2002). Teaching effectiveness and students’ behavior in small and large classes. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(2), 385–398.

Boser, U. (2019). The Common Core and student achievement: Narrowing gaps and raising standards. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cabansag, M. G. (2016). Unpacking competencies for better learning outcomes in the K to 12 curriculum. Asian Journal of Education, 11(2), 34–46.

Cabigao, J. G. (2019). Collaborative learning strategies in Philippine education. Philippine Journal of Education, 96(2), 45–52.

Calleja, M. B. (2019). Leadership and teacher support in educational reforms. Journal of Educational Leadership and Practice, 11(2), 59–70.

Castro, E. R. (2016). Contextualized teaching in Philippine basic education: Making learning relevant. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(2), 62–68.

Castro, R. A. (2016). Contextualized learning: Enhancing curriculum relevance through localization. Journal of Philippine Education Studies, 21(1), 13–23.

Cochran, W. G. (2008). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Granziera, H. (2018). Teachers’ self-efficacy and its links to professional learning and implementation of curriculum reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.009

Cordero, S., Aguilar, T., & Lopez, M. (2020). Pedagogical strategies in the implementation of new curricula: A student-centered approach. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 45(4), 225–240.

Corpuz, B. B., & Lucido, P. I. (2018). Educational foundations. Lorimar Publishing.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Cruz, A. P., Delos Reyes, J. T., & Salazar, M. N. (2021). Professional development practices for competency-based curriculum: Evidence from the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(4), 367–383.

Cruz, L. J., & Reyes, A. M. (2024). Evaluating the Revised K to 12 (MATATAG) Curriculum: Early insights and implementation outcomes. Journal of Philippine Education Reform, 16(1), 12–30.

Cruz, R. M., Santos, J. F., & Valerio, K. L. (2024). Curriculum responsiveness: Feedback mechanisms in MATATAG implementation. Philippine Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 44–59.

Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org

David, C. C., & Albert, J. R. G. (2021). Challenges and prospects of the K-12 program in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Delos Santos, C. A., & Ochoa, J. A. (2020). Sustaining curriculum reforms through professional development: Lessons from the K to 12 experience. Education Quarterly, 77(1), 21–38.

Delos Santos, M. R., & Ochoa, J. P. (2020). Teacher development in times of reform: Insights from the K to 12 transition. Teacher Education Quarterly, 17(3), 89–103.

Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). Curriculum guide for the MATATAG K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). Revised K to 12 (MATATAG) Curriculum framework. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum: Reforming basic education in the Philippines. Department of Education.

DepEd. (2022). Implementation review of the K to 12 curriculum. Department of Education, Philippines. https://deped.gov.ph

Desimone, L. M. (2019). The role of professional learning communities in teacher development. Educational Researcher, 48(5), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19838950

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

Dizon, M. C., Santos, R. P., & Fernando, A. J. (2024). Enhancing teacher preparedness: Insights from MATATAG curriculum rollout. Teacher Development Quarterly, 18(2), 67–85.

Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2015). Resource equity in Common Core implementation. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 34–50.

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective approach to teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Thought, 52(1), 1–15.

Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

Flores, M. A., & De Guzman, A. B. (2018). Authentic assessment challenges and practices in basic education. Philippine Social Science Journal, 1(1), 30–40.

Forero, R., Nahidi, S., De Costa, J., Mohsin, M., Fitzgerald, G., Gibson, N., & Aboagye-Sarfo, P. (2018). Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2

Francisco, M. J., & Nuñez, M. P. (2019). Improvisation and innovation: Filipino teachers’ responses to resource scarcity. Philippine Journal of Education and Teaching, 25(1), 41–56.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2020). The devil is in the details: System solutions for equity, excellence, and well-being. Corwin.

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.

Gonzales, J. M., Rivera, E. T., & Lopez, D. A. (2023). Industry-aligned curriculum: Evaluating the responsiveness of MATATAG to labor market trends. Philippine Education Studies, 6(1), 22–39.

Gonzales, J. P., & Penuela, R. C. (2018). Inclusive strategies: Diverse pedagogical approaches in Philippine classrooms. International Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 104–119.

Graham, P. (2020). Curriculum reform and teacher collaboration: Building learning communities. International Journal of Educational Reform, 29(3), 200–217.

Granziera, H., & Perera, H. N. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy, adaptability, and effectiveness in curriculum change. Educational Psychology, 39(5), 628–647.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.

Guskey, T. R. (2014). Planning professional learning. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 10–16.

Guskey, T. R. (2020). Evaluating professional development (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Guskey, T. R. (2020). Professional development and curriculum implementation: A review of empirical research. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(2), 1–13.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Pearson.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2016). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2019). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Heritage, M. (2018). Formative assessment in practice: A process of inquiry and action. Harvard Education Press.

Herman, J., & Goldstein, J. (2019). Common Core State Standards and learning outcomes in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 48(2), 98–109.

Huang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Teacher collaboration and curriculum implementation. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 625–639.

Hughes, J. E., & Swenson, K. (2021). Technology-rich curricula: Designing for collaboration and digital literacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09945-9

Inocian, R. B., & Baldico, J. L. (2020). Teacher agency and curriculum change: A Philippine context. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 353–370.

Ismail, H. N., & Yusof, N. (2018). Storytelling and dramatization: Effective strategies for moral education. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.2p.45

Javier, F. L., & Altea, C. D. (2018). Supply chain challenges in educational materials distribution: The Philippine experience. Journal of Public Sector Logistics, 10(1), 27–39.

Kennedy, M. M. (2021). How we learn about teacher learning. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019109

Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher characteristics and job contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1059–1069.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7–44.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher-student relationships on achievement and implementation of reforms. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317749728

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Labrague, L. J., & Ballad, C. A. (2021). Psychological well-being and resilience of Filipino teachers during educational transition. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 98–112.

Laguador, J. M. (2016). Mentoring framework in the Philippines: Building teacher capacity through peer collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(2), 1–7.

Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.

Leach, D., Thomas, R., & Mortimore, P. (2021). Reflective practice in teacher development: Impact on curriculum implementation. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101855.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2014). The development and validation of a school leadership framework. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 689–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13505761

Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2019). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(3), 485–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18761347

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper & Row.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Llego, M. A. (2020). Collaboration among teachers: A foundation for curriculum innovation in the Philippines. Philippine Education Review, 15(3), 87–102.

Lorenzo, J. C., Torres, E. M., & Dela Cruz, F. P. (2023). Stakeholder collaboration in curriculum reform: The MATATAG experience. Journal of Philippine Educational Leadership, 29(3), 101–120.

Luna, F. D., & Valenzuela, M. A. (2024). Resource equity in MATATAG curriculum implementation. Journal of Education Equity, 11(1), 33–47.

Magno, C., & Madrigal, D. V. (2020). Teacher workload, curriculum change, and burnout: A Philippine case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Malipot, M. H. (2019). Curriculum alignment and student performance under K to 12. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2019/03/24/curriculum-alignment-and-student-performance/

Manlangit, P., Sison, J. B., & Batoon, R. P. (2016). LAC sessions as a professional learning community model in the Philippines. Department of Education Policy Brief, 8(3), 1–10.

Manuel, M. A., & Medallon, A. A. (2020). Administrative workload and its effect on teachers’ instructional time in public schools. Philippine Social Science Review, 72(4), 45–63.

Mateo, C. J., & Domingo, K. M. (2022). Bridging pedagogy and curriculum content through professional development. Teacher Learning and Development Journal, 6(2), 68–83.

Mateo, J. M., & Domingo, M. C. (2022). Teacher training in times of curriculum change: A Filipino case study. International Journal of Education and Development, 12(1), 100–116.

Medina, A. M., & Gonzales, J. R. (2019). Parental involvement in education: Impact on student performance in elementary schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Research and Development, 13(1), 67–82.

Mendoza, R. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of curriculum relevance and effectiveness. Philippine Educational Journal, 18(1), 75–90.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Meyer, L. H., & Lueck, S. A. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of curriculum adoption: The role of teacher beliefs and professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09365-6

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96.

Orbe, M. M., & De Guzman, A. B. (2020). Curriculum guide utilization and MELC alignment in Philippine classrooms. Southeast Asian Journal of Education, 21(4), 203–219.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Pearson.

Padilla, R. J., & Mercado, L. D. (2021). Scaffolded learning in Philippine mathematics education: A response to curriculum reforms. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 150–164.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.

Pascual, R. V., & Rico, R. A. (2020). Improvised instructional materials: Creativity in the face of limitations. Philippine Teacher Education Journal, 28(1), 55–68.

Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, D. J., & Sherer, D. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on curriculum adoption: The role of professional experiences in the sense-making process. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1876034

Perez, D. (2023). Challenges in curriculum implementation: Class size and resource allocation. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 22(3), 152–170.

Ramos, G. P., & Santiago, R. L. (2020). Challenges in English language teaching in multilingual settings. Language and Literacy Education Journal, 9(2), 112–128.

Reyes, M. C. (2019). Integrating foundational skills in early childhood classrooms. Philippine Journal of Early Education, 7(1), 77–89.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387

Tezci, E. (2016). Teachers’ views on the use of educational technology in classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 53–59.

Tesch, R. (2013). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Routledge.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Murphy, M. (2015). Leading for differentiation: Growing teachers who grow kids. ASCD.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2015). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Tupas, R. (2018). Language education and inequality in the Philippines: Multilingual education meets globalization. Language and Education, 32(4), 314–328.

Tupas, R., & Martin, I. P. (2017). Contextualized language learning in the Philippines: Issues and directions. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 48(2), 100–118.

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Teacher collaboration and professional development: The impact on curriculum innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103048

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Published in

Discover more from Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading