The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

> About
> Editorial Board
> Guidelines for Authors
> Volumes and Issues
> Open Access

PANTAO, an International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, with ISSN 3028-0877, is an annual journal that serves as a scholarly platform dedicated to the exploration and dissemination of research in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences.


Latest Articles

Author

Jhonavie R. Alloso
Cebu Technological University-Main Campus
Graduate School, College of Education
Cor. M.J. Cuenco Ave. & R. Palma St., Cebu City, Philippines
Email: jhonavie.alloso@gmail.com

Abstract

This descriptive quantitative study evaluated the effectiveness of a locally developed Automated PHIL-IRI Template in streamlining data consolidation within the DepEd Toledo City Division, addressing the delays and inconsistencies inherent in traditional manual methods. Through a survey of 116 public elementary educators and administrators guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the research found the template to be “Very Effective” (Grand Mean = 3.48), with 86.2% of participants adopting it as their primary tool for significantly reducing workload and accelerating report generation. While personal demographics such as age and sex played no role in the tool’s perceived effectiveness, contextual factors—including school size, type, and previous training—were statistically significant influencers (p<0.05). Ultimately, the study concludes that the automated template is a highly accepted innovation for improving data accuracy and efficiency, recommending intensified formal training and tailored technical support to ensure universal adoption across the division.

Keywords: Administration and supervision, reading comprehension, quasi-experimental research, Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501797

Recommended citation:
Alloso, J. R. (2026). Effectiveness of automated Phil-IRI templates in streamlining division-level data consolidation. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 5 (1), 8891-8899. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0501797

Read the full text

References

Ajayi, G. A. (2017). Automation in educational institutions: Impact and strategic implementation. IGI Global.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

Dela Cruz, M. R. (2020). Efficacy of technology-aided reading interventions for struggling learners in the Philippines (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

Department of Education. (2018). DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2018: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (PHIL-IRI). Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Memorandum No. 42, s. 2020: Guidelines on the conduct of assessment of learner performance. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2021). DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2021: School calendar and activities for School Year 2021–2022. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (n.d.). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (PHIL-IRI) manual (Revised ed.). Bureau of Learning Delivery, Department of Education.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. R. A. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191.

Lari, M., Al-Saif, A., & Al-Hunaiyyan, A. (2020). Digital transformation in education: Factors affecting the acceptance of learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(11), 123–130.

Madden, M., & Macias, A. (2022). Automation and the future of work in education: Policy recommendations. Pew Research Center.

National Economic and Development Authority. (2017). Philippine Development Plan 2017–2022. NEDA.

Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in Northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–15.

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Santos, L. B. (2018). Automation of educational data management systems: An assessment of teacher readiness and satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Philippine Normal University, Manila, Philippines.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of data management systems in Chinese schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(2), 1–18.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Published in

Discover more from Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences)

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading