Author
Veronica P. Polea
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus
Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
Email: veronica.polea@deped.gov.ph
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between teachers’ training and their preparedness for inclusive teaching at Subabasbas Elementary School, Division of Lapu-Lapu City, during the School Year 2025–2026. Anchored on constructivist learning theory, Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, and Guskey’s model of teacher professional development, the study sought to determine whether teachers’ demographic characteristics and participation in inclusive education–related training were associated with their perceived readiness to implement inclusive teaching practices. Specifically, the study assessed teachers’ preparedness in terms of knowledge and understanding of inclusive education principles, instructional strategies for diverse learners, classroom management in inclusive settings, and collaboration with parents and support staff. A quantitative descriptive-comparative research design was employed, utilizing complete enumeration sampling involving thirty (30) teachers. Data were gathered through an adapted Teachers’ Preparedness for Inclusive Teaching Questionnaire (TPITQ), validated by experts for contextual relevance. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize respondents’ profiles and levels of preparedness, while Chi-Square tests, independent samples t-tests, and one-way analysis of variance were applied to determine relationships and group differences at a 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that there was no statistically significant relationship between teachers’ training and their preparedness for inclusive teaching across all domains. Likewise, no significant differences were found in teachers’ preparedness when grouped according to age, sex, educational attainment, years of teaching experience, and type of inclusive education training attended. These results suggest that teachers’ perceived readiness for inclusive teaching may be influenced more by contextual and institutional factors such as school support systems, access to resources, and practical classroom experiences rather than by demographic variables or training exposure alone. Based on the findings, a Proposed Professional Development Action Plan was formulated to strengthen teachers’ preparedness for inclusive teaching through sustained, school-based, and needs-responsive professional development initiatives.
Keywords: Inclusive teaching, teacher training, teacher preparedness
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404679
Recommended citation:
Polea, V. P. (2025). Relationship between teachers’ training and their preparedness for inclusive teaching. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (4), 7452-7466. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404679
Read the full text
References
Acharya, B. (2017). Factors affecting difficulties in learning mathematics by mathematics learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11
Adams, M., Berkesch, C., Kra, B., Blackman, T., Kloefkorn, T., & Venkatesh, A. (2024, February 3). Artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities in postsecondary mathematics education. American Mathematical Society. https://www.ams.org/about-us/CoEwhitepaper2024.pdf
Akpan, V., Igwe, U., Blessing, I., Mpamah, I., & Okoro, C. (2020). Social constructivism: Implications on teaching and learning. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(8), 49–56. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Social-Constructivism.pdf
Andriani, S., Nurlaelah, E., & Yulianti, K. (2019). The effect of process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model toward students’ logical thinking ability in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042108
Antony, W. (2024). What is ethical consideration in research? Help for Assessment. https://www.helpforassessment.com/blog/ethical-consideration-in-research/
Baldwin, T., Mazarin, J., & Pisano, G. (n.d.). Effective teaching: Definition, principles, and methods. Study.com. https://study.com/learn/lesson/what-is-effective-teaching.html
Beers, B. (2024). P-value: What it is, how to calculate it, and examples. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/p-value.asp
Bhandari, P. (2024). Ethical considerations in research: Types and examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-ethics/
Bombaes, A., Fuasan, J., & Garcia, W. (2021). Exploring the factors in student retention of e-learning mathematics: A case of Grade 12 senior high school students at the University of Perpetual Help System–Pueblo de Panay Campus. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367602558
Bouslog, M. (2024). Effective teaching strategies used in today’s classrooms. GraduateProgram.org. https://www.graduateprogram.org/blog/teaching-strategies-used-in-todays-classroom/
Catubig, M. B. (2023). Exploring student-centered approaches in mathematics education: A qualitative case study. Excellencia International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(3). https://multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/download/27/72/100
Cleave, R. (2023). Structured or semi-structured questionnaire? SmartSurvey. https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/blog/structured-or-semi-structured-questionnaire
ContentSquare. (2024). Five qualitative data analysis methods. https://contentsquare.com/guides/qualitative-data-analysis/methods/
Cornel, D., & Drew, C. (2023). Prior knowledge (educational concept): Meaning and examples. Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/prior-knowledge/
Degree Doctor. (2024). Braun and Clarke thematic analysis: How to do the six-step process in your qualitative research project. https://www.thedegreedoctor.com/blog/braun-and-clarke-thematic-analysis-how-to-do-the-six-step-process-in-your-qualitative-research-project
Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015: Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 basic education program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DO_s2015_08.pdf
Department of Education. (2019). DepEd Order No. 021, s. 2019: Policy guidelines on the K to 12 basic education program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/DO_s2019_021.pdf
Department of Education. (2019). K to 12 curriculum guide: Mathematics (Grade 1 to Grade 10). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Math-CG_with-tagged-math-equipment.pdf
Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 034, s. 2022: School calendar and activities for the school year 2022–2023. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DO_s2022_034.pdf
Drew, C. (2023). Bruner’s spiral curriculum: The three key principles. Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/spiral-curriculum/
Drew, C. (2023). Meaningful learning: Definition, benefits, and examples. Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/meaningful-learning/
Edith Cowan University. (2021). Teaching strategies. https://intranet.ecu.edu.au/learning/curriculum-design/teaching-strategies
Fournier, B. (2023). Quantitative vs. qualitative research in psychology. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-difference-between-quantitative-and-qualitative-research-4588136
Google Cloud. (n.d.). What is artificial intelligence (AI)? https://cloud.google.com/learn/what-is-artificial-intelligence
Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Komolainen, E. (2007). Academic self-beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in mathematics: A structural model. Learning and Instruction, 28(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701413753
Harvard Catalyst. (n.d.). Mixed methods research. https://catalyst.harvard.edu/community-engagement/mmr/
Hassan, M. (2023). Ethical considerations: Types, examples, and writing guide. ResearchMethod.net. https://researchmethod.net/ethical-considerations/
Hassan, M. (2023). External validity: Threats, examples, and types. ResearchMethod.net. https://researchmethod.net/external-validity/
Hassan, M. (2023). Reliability: Types, examples, and guide. ResearchMethod.net. https://researchmethod.net/reliability/
Hawthorne, H. (2022). What is effective teaching? High Speed Training. https://www.highspeedtraining.co.uk/hub/what-is-effective-teaching/
Hornbuckle, S. (2022). Five reasons pretests and posttests in education matter. YouScience. https://www.youscience.com/resources/blog/pretest-and-posttest-in-education/
Hudson, J. (2016). Prior knowledge as an unexpected obstacle to learning. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/course-design-ideas/prior-knowledge-unexpected-obstacle-learning/
Kendra, C. (2022). Overview of the problem-solving mental process. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-problem-solving-2795485
Koskinenn, R., & Pitkäniemi, P. (2022). Meaningful learning in mathematics: A research synthesis of teaching approaches. Educational Researcher, 17(2), emo679. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1336141.pdf
Kuehn, J. (2024). Function and importance of pre and post-tests. HubPages. https://discover.hubpages.com/education/PrePost-Test-A-Diagnostic-Tool-For-More-Effective-Teaching-of-EFL-Students
Lohman, D., & Hurst, J. (2023). Social constructivism: Definition, benefits, and examples. Study.com. https://study.com/academy/lesson/social-constructivism-and-the-mediated-learning-experience.html
Luzano, J. F. P. (2024). AI-powered pedagogies in mathematics education: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research, 8(5), 43–47. http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/5/abs/IJAPR240508.html
Maloy, R. W., Edwards, S. A., & Anderson, G. (2010). Teaching math problem solving using a web-based tutoring system, learning games, and students’ writing. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(1). https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1467
McLeod, S. (2023). Constructivism learning theory and philosophy of education. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
McLeod, S. A. (2023). P-value and statistical significance: What it is and why it matters. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/p-value.html
Melchor, P. J., Lomibao, L., & Parcutilo, J. (2023). Exploring the potential of AI integration in mathematics education for Generation Alpha: Approaches, challenges, and readiness of Philippine tertiary classrooms. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 39–44. http://pubs.sciepub.com/jitl/3/1/8
Melo, N. (2023). Incorporating artificial intelligence into the classroom: An examination of benefits, challenges, and best practices. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/incorporating-artificial-intelligence-into-classroom-examination-benefits-challenges-and-best-practices
Mihalca, L., Salden, R. J. C. M., Corbalan, G., Paas, F., & Miclea, M. (2011). Effectiveness of cognitive-load based adaptive instruction in genetics education. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.027
Mohamed, M. Z. B., Hidayat, R., Suhaizi, N. N. B., Mat Sabri, N. B., Mahmud, M. K. H. B., & Baharuddin, S. N. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0694. https://www.iejme.com/download/artificial-intelligence-in-mathematics-education-a-systematic-literature-review-12132.pdf
Morris, V. (2023). I do, we do, you do: Introducing new learning. Atom Learning. https://atomlearning.com/blog/gradual-release-of-responsibility
NAEP. (2022). 2022 NAEP mathematics assessment. National Center for Education Statistics. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/mathematics/2022/
Ningsih, E., & Retnowati, E. (2020). Prior knowledge in mathematics learning. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344147165_Prior_Knowledge_in_Mathematics_Learning
Olasedidun, O., Ganiyu, R., Makinde, S., & Hamzat, S. (2024). Evaluating instructional package for teaching mathematics to hearing-impaired students. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 18(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.56557/jogress/2024/v18i38761
Ompok, C., Mei Teng, L., & Sapirai, J. (2021). Effect of games towards children’s mathematics performance. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1296276
Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Ndlovu, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202426428
Panjaitan, B., & Zuhri. (2019). The outcomes of learning mathematics in mathematics classrooms. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340307501_The_Outcomes_of_Learning_Mathematics_in_Mathematics_Classroom
Park, K., Brombacher, A., Brocardo, J., & Steen, L. (2008). The role of mathematics in the overall curriculum. International Mathematical Union. https://www.mathunion.org/icmi/role-mathematics-overall-curriculum
PhilAtlas. (2023). Cawayan, Municipality of Dalaguete, Province of Cebu. https://www.philatlas.com/visayas/r07/cebu/dalaguete/cawayan.html
Question AI. (2024). Best AI homework help online for free. https://questionai.ai/
Qureshi, M., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J., Raza, S., & Yousufi, S. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Ramento, M. N. S., Natad, A. G. D., Habelito, V. C., & Gumiran, I. C. (2025). Exploring Question AI as a pedagogical tool in higher mathematics education. ICPD Journal of Global Multidisciplinary Innovations, 1(1), 1–16. https://www.icepd-ojs.org/index.php/ijglomi/article/view/5
Roblon, A., Cano, A., Miñoza, G., Recomo, J., Monares, J., Arriola, M., Polancos, Q., & Mutya, R. (2022). Business and education research. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied, 3(12), 2498–2508. https://ijmaberjournal.org/index.php/ijmaber/article/view/652/402
Rosales, M. E. Q. (2023). Your modern business guide to data analysis methods and techniques. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/610469750
Shamboul, H. (2022). The importance of critical thinking on the teaching-learning process. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357652909_The_Importance_of_Critical_Thinking_on_Teaching_Learning_Process
Simonsmeier, B., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2021). Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 102007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1939700
Stumpfegger, E. (2017). Trustworthiness of research. Munich Business School. https://www.munich-business-school.de/insights/en/2017/trustworthiness-of-research/
TeachThought Staff. (2024). What is the gradual release of responsibility model? TeachThought. https://www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/gradual-release-responsibility/
UNESCO. (2023). Artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence
UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO’s education response to COVID-19. https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response/initiatives
Varaidzaimakondo, P., & Makondo, D. (2020). Causes of poor academic performance in mathematics at ordinary level: A case of Mavuzani High School, Zimbabwe. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342010903_Causes_of_Poor_Academic_Performance_in_Mathematics_at_Ordinary_Level_A_Case_of_Mavuzani_High_School_Zimbabwe
Vinney, S. (2019, July 23). What is a schema in psychology? ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/schema-definition-4691768
Widiyatmoko, A., Utaminingsih, S., & Santoso. (2021). Android-based math learning to improve critical thinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823(1), 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012091