Meriam C. Angana*, Kyle Jay Padilla, Regina P. Galigao, and Christian Jake A. Gabas (Authors)
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of technology on the transformation of teaching and learning, specifically analyzing the Enhanced K–12 Curriculum in the Philippines and comparing it with selected educational systems in 18 countries across six continents. The research engages a qualitative comparative case study methodology to examine the integration of technology within curriculum frameworks, its influence on instructional methodologies, and the degree to which it fosters or constrains equity and access. The findings indicate that although technology enhances interactive pedagogy and fosters 21st-century abilities, systemic gaps in infrastructure, digital literacy, and socio-economic resources persist, further establishing divisions. Comparative observations reveal that high-resource contexts namely: Finland, Singapore, South Korea leverage technology to enhance individualized, inquiry-based learning, whereas low-resource contexts specifically South Africa, Brazil, rural Philippines encounter ongoing access difficulties. The results show that we need policies that include everyone, better digital infrastructure, and more training for teachers to make sure that technology makes things fairer instead of making them worse.
Keywords: Enhanced K-12, impact of technology, transformation of teaching and learning, curriculum frameworks, educational system, data mining
*Corresponding author
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404500
Recommended citation:
Angana, M. C., Padilla, K. J., Galigao, R. P., & Gabas, C. J. A. (2025). The impact of Technology on teaching and learning: Implications for equity and access in the Enhanced K–12 curriculum in the Philippines and selected education systems worldwide. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (4), 5397-5404. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404500
Read the full text
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (2020). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (3rd ed.). Springer.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A., & Edgerton, A. K. (2020). Restarting and reinventing school: Learning in the time of COVID and beyond. Learning Policy Institute.
Department of Education (DepEd). (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide. Republic of the Philippines.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2022). Australian curriculum framework. Government of Australia.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2020). Course of study for elementary schools. Japan.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Education policy outlook 2019: Working together to help students achieve their potential. OECD Publishing.
Sahlberg, P. (2019). FinnishED leadership: Four big, inexpensive ideas to transform education. Corwin Press.
Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of education in the Philippines: The new normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311