Maricarl C. Leaño*, Josh Christian I. Bernabe, Mark Kent I. Del Rosario, Edilyn P. Mallo, Karl Jexel A. Talaba, and Pops V. Madriaga (Authors)

Abstract

Since it evolved from a secretive military tool, cryptography has been a potent instrument in the hands of governments, businesses, and individuals to administer infrastructure and protect the integrity of their systems. It has become an integral part of digital independence. Examples of these industries are e-commerce, finance, and healthcare. It also helps to design Blockchain, cryptocurrency, and innovative contract technologies. Cryptography supports the stability of operations in a digital environment by protecting data and its privacy, ensuring the security of exchanges, and confirming identities. For instance, the protection of financial transactions through the Internet is guaranteed by the encryption methods (SSL/TLS). The stability of communications is ensured by encryption methods (SSL/TLS), and digital signatures and certificates guarantee the reliability of communication. Likewise, using a cryptographic system to protect personal data in medical facilities would significantly boost privacy and responsibility. The real-life application examples show that an organization can use cryptography to secure and gain control over its internet-based resources. However, cryptography has a dark side. It is more sophisticated and targeted by cybercriminals. Moreover, cryptographic attack threats on the Internet keep improving. The issue of quantum computing endangers the encryption process embraced by traditional means, and there is a need to develop post-quantum cryptography and other more sophisticated systems. The above issues highlight that cryptography, although an essential tool, must not be the sole method of ensuring digital security. This study considers the practical benefits and limitations of cryptography for digital sovereignty. The findings show that cryptography protects digital systems, trust, and innovation. However, its integration with cybersecurity programs can be effective only when the regulatory systems are enforced and constantly improved. Cryptography strengthens digital independence by establishing a secure and dependable digital ecosystem, but it needs comprehensive strategic support to ensure resilience in a complicated environment.

Keywords: Cryptography, Digital Sovereignty, security, privacy, cybersecurity, digital infrastructure

*Corresponding author

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404494

Recommended citation:

Leaño, M. C., Bernabe, J. C. I., Del Rosario, M. K. I., Mallo, E. P., Talaba, K. J. A., & Madriaga, P. V. (2025). Cryptography as Digital Sovereignty: An impact analysis of its uses, challenges, and modern applications. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (4), 5337-5345. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0404494

Read the full text

References

Schneier, B. (2015). Applied cryptography: Protocols, algorithms, and source code in C. Wiley.

Internet Society. (n.d.). Navigating digital sovereignty and its impact on the Internet. https://www.internetsociety.org/

Paar, C., & Pelzl, J. (2010). Understanding cryptography: A textbook for students and practitioners. Springer.

Rescorla, E. (2000). SSL and TLS: Designing and building secure systems. Addison-Wesley.

Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978). A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Communications of the ACM, 21(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/359340.359342

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2024). Cybersecurity threat trends 2024. ENISA. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/

Bernstein, D. J., Buchmann, J., & Dahmen, E. (2009). Post-quantum cryptography. Springer.

Kshetri, N. (2017). Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommunications Policy, 41(10), 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.09.003

Kruse, C. S., Frederick, B., Jacobson, T., & Monticone, D. K. (2017). Security techniques for the electronic health records. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(8), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0778-4

Stallings, W. (2017). Cryptography and network security: Principles and practice (7th ed.). Pearson.

Chen, L., Jordan, S., Liu, Y.-K., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., & Smith-Tone, D. (2016). Report on post-quantum cryptography. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8105

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). Cryptographic standards and guidelines. NIST. https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-standards-and-guidelines

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2023). Cryptography in the digital era. ENISA. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/

Kshetri, N. (2021). Cryptography and security in the age of digital transformation. IEEE IT Professional, 23(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2021.3058663

Cloud Security Alliance (CSA). (2022). Future of cryptography. CSA Reports. https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/