Roselle Mae P. Otero (Author)
Abstract
This study examined how Loreto West District elementary schools collaborated to mitigate disaster risk. It profiled the schools’ vulnerability, school size, topography, and risk level. It also examined the school’s disaster risk reduction management, specifically on the indicators of SDRRM specified in DepEd Order 33 series of 2021 in terms of prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, and rehabilitation. It also examined the school’s DRRM team’s challenges. The study revealed that blocked pathways were the greatest exposure risk in classrooms, followed by swinging doors and protruding nails from chairs and tables. Broken toilet bowls, sinks, and chairs/desks/tables were the greatest threat, followed by exposed chemicals and liquids. Stray animals inside the school and an open/incomplete perimeter barrier increase school vulnerability. There was also no emergency hotline or method for student release to parents. Respondents indicated that their school was less than a kilometer from the river, while others were 1 to 3 kilometers and 5 to 10 kilometers away. These studies found that most respondents reside near bodies of water, making them vulnerable to water disasters. In addition, some teachers are assigned to schools located on hills or mountains, while others live at the foot of these hills or mountains. In the four categories, risk level did not significantly affect DRRM implementation. The null hypothesis was therefore not rejected. The school’s risk level did not correspond to the school’s implementation of the DRRM program. To elucidate, the school should coordinate its implementation in combating the effects of disaster, as the schools are situated in a prone area. The more disaster-prone the school, the more crucial its DRRM program implementation. Implementers may have a heightened sense of urgency to execute, strengthen, and sustain DRRM programs in their assigned schools. It was also found that the DRRM team members lack disaster-resilience training, knowledge, and skills, and are therefore recommended for training. Materials, gadgets, and communication between schools and municipal governments were also lacking. As the number of staff, students, parents, and other stakeholders varies with school size, so do preparedness, mitigation, and recovery techniques vary.
Keywords: Disaster Risk Reduction Management, extent of implementation, prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, and rehabilitation
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403451
Recommended citation:
Otero, R. M. P. (2025). The collaborative efforts in Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) in Loreto West District Elementary Schools. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (3), 4851-4865. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403451
Read the full text
References
Bhardwaj, P. (2019). Types of sampling in research. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 5(3), 157.
Cañete, S. M. Regression model for the professional engagement among high school teachers in disaster risk reduction management.
Cubillas, A. U. (2018). The implementation of the elementary schools. International Journal of Current Research.
Dimalanta, R. C., & Salcedo, R. E. (2018). Disaster risk reduction and management capability of coordinators in schools division office of San Carlos City, Pangasinan. PSU Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(2), 35–44.
Farazmand, A. (2017). Crisis and emergency management: Theory and practice. In Crisis and emergency management (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
Gabion, J. G., & Bernardino, L. T., Jr. Teachers’ awareness on the implementation of the school-based disaster management program: Bases for a proposed action plan.
Gagani, R. F. M., & Montalban, R. (2019). Disaster and risk reduction preparedness evaluation of the 6th district schools of Lapu-Lapu City. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 203–206.
Gumasing, M. J. J., Prasetyo, Y. T., Ong, A. K. S., Nadlifatin, R., & Persada, S. F. (2022). Determining factors affecting the perceived preparedness of super typhoon: Three broad domains of ergonomics approach. Sustainability, 14(19), 12202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912202
Ibrahim, A. K., & Pezario, F. I. R. (2019). Hindering factors in implementing the disaster risk reduction and management plan of Daliao Elementary School: Basis for strengthening DRRM program. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2N).
Lapada, A. (2022). Disaster risk reduction knowledge among Filipino senior high school students. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 2(1), 56–73.
Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
Lopez, A. A., Echavez, N. A., Magallen, J. C., & Sales, E. L. (2018). Level of compliance with the risk reduction and disaster preparedness program among public secondary schools in Buenavista, Bohol, Philippines. ACADEME, 12.
Mamon, M. A. C. (2020). Implementation and practices of the comprehensive school safety framework: Views of senior high school students.
Martinez, M. Q., Mella, M. C. G., & Lisay, M. S. (2019). Capacity-building initiatives for a disaster-ready school community: Development of a comprehensive disaster risk reduction management plan.
Mella, M. C. G., Martinez, M. Q., & Lisay, M. S. (2021). Capacity-building initiatives for a disaster-ready school community: Development of a comprehensive disaster risk reduction management plan. I DREAM Research Journal, 222.
Nakileza, B. R., & Nedala, S. (2020). Topographic influence on landslides characteristics and implication for risk management in upper Manafwa catchment, Mt Elgon Uganda. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 7, 1–13.
Rahmawati, Mathias, S., Reaney, S., Vesuviano, G., Suwarman, R., & Ramdhan, A. (2022). Impact of land cover, rainfall, and topography on flood risk in West Java. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05737-6
Salita, C., Tiongco, R. E., & Kawano, R. (2021). Assessment of school teachers’ disaster preparedness using the extended parallel process model: A cross-sectional study in Angeles City, Philippines. Journal of Public Health, 29(6), 1275–1282.
Sukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. Language Institute Chulalongkorn University, 1(3), 1–20.
Tabilon-Tizon, R., & Comighud, S. M. T. (2020). Implementation of the public schools’ disaster risk reduction management program and level of capabilities to respond. UBT Knowledge Center, 48.
Tawas, S. K. A., & Millan, M. S. R. (2021). Susceptibility and proximity of schools to potential landslides in Agusan del Sur: A geospatial analysis. Revista Geintec-Gestao Inovacao E Tecnologias, 11(3), 1606–1613.
Tizon, R. T., & Comighud, S. M. T. (2020). Implementation of the public schools’ disaster risk reduction management program and level of capabilities to respond.
Toledo, R. J. T., Tantoy, O. A., & Paraiso, R. M. (2020). Development of disaster risk management and mitigation extension program for school-aged children in the province of Bukidnon. Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 62.
Tolentino, K. (2021). Education in emergency—the school managers’ practices on risk reduction and management of disaster. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 1(1), 10–23.
Tsioulou, A., Faure Walker, J., Lo, D. S., & Yore, R. (2021). A method for determining the suitability of schools as evacuation shelters and aid distribution hubs following disasters: Case study from Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Natural Hazards, 105(2), 1835–1859.
Ughulu, S., & Thomas, I. (2021). Applicability of emergency management theory in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Global Journal of Social Sciences, 20, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjss.v20i1.9