Lissete Ong (Author)

Abstract

Issues such as those examined in this study often present multiple perspectives, revealing that no program or intervention is ever entirely flawless. Based on the responses from the 20 participants, it is evident that despite the Philippine government’s development program aimed at addressing the primary needs of Filipino households, significant challenges remain unresolved. Progress toward the program’s goals appears stagnant, and a considerable degree of improvement is still required before the intended outcomes can be realized fully. Similar to experiences in other countries that have adopted comparable economic programs under various names but sharing a common objective, transformative progress remains elusive. This stagnation can be attributed, in part, to deeply ingrained cultural factors that resist rapid change. Culture, having been cultivated and internalized over generations, shapes behaviors and social norms in ways that cannot be quickly altered. The widening disparity among social classes exacerbates what is often termed the cultural gap or lag, a condition indicative of underdevelopment. Consequently, even a well-funded and robust economic program may serve only as a superficial solution—a mere enhancement without addressing the fundamental issues at its core. In addressing the study’s hypothesis, findings indicate no significant relationship between the general demographic profiles of beneficiaries and the reasons for discontinuing participation in the 4Ps program. Factors such as age or the number of household members enrolled appear less influential than the sustained commitment of government policies to tackle poverty systematically. While current efforts are commendable, they fall short of delivering comprehensive or lasting solutions at this juncture. Moreover, the decision to continue or discontinue program participation seems largely contingent on the personal choices of beneficiaries, influenced by a range of individual circumstances. Throughout this process, a profound acculturation occurs, shaped not by inherent traits but by evolving environmental factors that alter priorities and outlooks. Such shifts often result in missed opportunities, evoking feelings of regret among those who fail to capitalize on available resources. This underscores the critical role of education, which equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate life’s pathways, make informed decisions, and cultivate the resilience and determination required to achieve their goals.

Keywords: 4Ps program implementation, education discontinuity, cultural influence on poverty programs

DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403347

Recommended citation:

Ong, L. (2025). Is the 4PS program of the Philippine government a boon or a bane in terms of implementation in education? (An action research). Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (3), 3772-3778. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403347

Read the full text

References

Asian Development Bank. (2013). Philippines: Conditional cash transfer program impact evaluation 2012. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/30377/philippines-cct-impact-evaluation-2012.pdf

Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2019). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program annual accomplishment report. https://pantawid.dswd.gov.ph

Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1

Fernandez, L., Olfindo, R., & Yu, S. (2011). Philippines conditional cash transfer program impact evaluation. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/263481468295567055

International Labour Organization. (2016). Social protection for children in the Philippines. https://www.ilo.org

Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2016). Social protection and sustainable development. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. https://www.unescap.org

Lomibao, B. M., & Tamayo, L. J. (2018). Conditional cash transfers and school attendance in the Philippines: Evidence from 4Ps. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 1(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/000000000.0000

Manasan, R. G. (2011). Expansion of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program and its fiscal sustainability. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1105.pdf

National Economic and Development Authority. (2017). Philippine Development Plan 2017–2022. https://pdp.neda.gov.ph

Reyes, C. M., Tabuga, A. D., Asis, R. D., & Mondez, M. P. (2015). Child poverty in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1517.pdf

Rostow, W. W. (1990). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625824

Schelzig, K. (2005). Poverty in the Philippines: Income, assets, and access. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/poverty-philippines-income-assets-and-access

Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2010.0017

Son, H. H. (2008). Conditional cash transfer programs: An effective tool for poverty alleviation? Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/conditional-cash-transfer-programs-effective-tool-poverty-alleviation

United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier—Human development and the Anthropocene. http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report

World Bank. (2018). Philippines—Making growth work for the poor: A poverty assessment. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/273231529255680246