*Jaylaiza Penote-Alipao and Regina P. Galigao (Authors)
Abstract
This study addresses the pressing issue of education inequality, a pervasive problem that denies millions of individuals and groups access to quality education, a fundamental human right. Through a mixed-methods approach, this research explores the complex dynamics of education inequality and identifies strategies for promoting systemic change. The findings underscore the need for a multifaceted approach to address the root causes of education inequality, including policy, pedagogical, and socio-economic factors. The study highlights the importance of inclusive policy frameworks that prioritize equity and access, teacher training programs that foster culturally responsive teaching practices, community engagement initiatives that promote parental involvement and social support, and technology integration that bridges the digital divide. By examining the intersections of policy, practice, and community, this research provides a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities for promoting systemic change in education. The study’s findings have significant implications for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders seeking to address education inequality. By shedding light on the complex issues surrounding education inequality and identifying effective strategies for systemic change, this research contributes to the ongoing conversation about how to create more equitable and inclusive education systems. Ultimately, this study aims to inform policies and practices that promote equal access to quality education, empowering individuals and communities to reach their full potential.
Keywords: education inequality, systemic change, equitable access, quality education
*Corresponding author
DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403327
Recommended citation
Penote-Alipao, J.P. & Galigao, R.P. (2025). Addressing educational disparities: A sociological approach to bridging gaps in access and quality. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences) 4 (3), 3586-3595. http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403327
Read the full text
References
Anderson, J., & Miller, R. (2023). School-community partnerships and student outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Partnerships, 10(2), 112–128.
Harrison, L., & Clarke, S. (2024). Industry partnerships and vocational education alignment in Australia. Australian Journal of Vocational Education, 15(1), 45–62.
Tremblay, M., & Dubois, P. (2021). Collaborative networks and curriculum reform in Canada. Canadian Journal of Educational Policy, 12(4), 330–347.
Gamage, D. T., &Ueyama, T. (2022). Public perceptions of education reform in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(5), 651–665.
Motala, E., & Vally, S. (2020). Community engagement in education reform: A case study of a South African township. Journal of Education and Human Development, 9(2), 1–12.
InsightsIAS. (2025). Transforming Indian higher education: NEP 2020 and the path to flexibility and reform.
Oracion, (2020). Advancing the K-12 reform from the ground: A case study in the Philippines.
Pham, H., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Higher education curriculum reforms in Vietnam in the era of globalization. In Globalization and education reforms (pp. 45–62).
Sulistiyani, A. T. (2022). Disparities in educational access and quality in rural Indonesia: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 1–15.
Buenrostro, M. C. (2020). Differentiated instruction for diverse learners: A Philippine perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 419–433.
Liu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). Exploring the role of national education information center in promoting educational equity in China. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2371–2387.